No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 29, 2008 · in the opinion

    Satterfield v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2008)

    … Durabla Manufacturing Co.; Enpro Industries, Inc.; Exxon Mobil Corp.; Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.; Garock Sealing Technologies, LLC; General Electric Company; Goodrich Corp.; Guard-Line, Inc.; John Crane, Inc.; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; Northern Natural Gas Co…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · November 5, 2003 · in the opinion

    In re Sears, Roebuck and Co. (2003)

    …heaters and boilers of any brand name (not just Homart), and added furnaces and heaters. Further, the lists included materials and products allegedly "associated" with these appliances, including electric elements, fittings, repair parts, accessories, pipe coverings…

  3. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 1, 2009

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Smith (2009)

    …Texas City; Hexion (Smith-Douglas) facility, Texas City, Texas City pipefitter and general laborer Union Carbide Texas City plant Texas City; pipefitter Union Carbide Texas City plant Texas City; pipefitter Hexion (Smith-Douglas) facility, Texas City…

  4. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · January 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    In re EI DU Pont DE Nemours and Company (2015)

    …a preponderance of the evidence or even affirmative evidence, because to require such would incorrectly shift the burden of proof. Clophus v. General Motors Corp., 769 S.W.2d 669, 670 (Tex. App.-Houston \[14th Dist.…

  5. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 21, 2006 · in the opinion

    Gilcrease v. Garlock, Inc. (2006)

    …We do not address whether reversible error occurred from an improper final argument. Citing the general rule that recovery of actual damages are a prerequisite to the receipt of exemplary damages,\[8\] Garlock next maintains that…

  6. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Torres (2019)

    …439 S.W.3d 332, 352 (Tex. 2014). Appellants do not dispute general causation. That is, they do not dispute that asbestos is capable of causing mesothelioma. However, each appellant argues that Oscar failed to establish…

  7. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    Ross v. Union Carbide Corporation (2009)

    …the parties also stated their intentions in broad but general terms: It is the intent and purpose of this agreement that at no time will the Releasees be called upon to pay any further sum or…