No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

10 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 31, 1990 · in the opinion

    Celotex Corp. v. Tate (1990)

    …into a hopper, scooped it from the hopper onto a scale, and carried it to the mixer. Tate also worked as an electrician at the plant, and the evidence reflected that, in this capacity, he was…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · April 19, 2007 · in the opinion

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2007)

    Altimore or those "similarly situated" takes the focus off Exxon's knowledge of a general danger relative to the qualities of asbestos. By focusing on epidemiological studies, the majority fails to follow our earlier pronouncement that…

  3. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 25, 2009 · in the opinion

    In re Wilhite (2009)

    …at most, that the plaintiffs are suing the same defendant for injuries caused by asbestos exposure at the same general location during the same period of time, but the documents do not show that these injuries…

  4. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 18, 2020

    Andrews v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)

    …and remanded for further proceedings. General maritime law preempts state law for a Navy sailor's asbestos products claims against a gasket maker, and DOHSA does not bar a general maritime survival recovery for the decedent…

  5. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · November 30, 2000 · in the opinion

    Pustejovsky v. Rapid-American Corp. (2000)

    …American argues that Pustejovsky's lack of knowledge of the scope of his damages from his exposure to asbestos does not affect the accrual of his cause of action. Following these general rules, Rapid American contends…

  6. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)

    …a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…

  7. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 27, 2007 · in the opinion

    Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)

    …Nevertheless, appellees argue that this memorandum evidences Alcoa's general knowledge that "contaminants could be taken home." Knowledge of the general danger of contact-poisoning from "chemical products," however, does not amount to knowledge of the…

  8. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)

    …Nevertheless, appellees argue that this memorandum evidences Alcoa's general knowledge that "contaminants could be taken home." Knowledge of the general danger of contact-poisoning from "chemical products," however, does not amount to knowledge of the…

  9. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)

    …a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…

  10. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 1, 2006 · in the opinion

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2006)

    …9 (Tex. App.CHouston \[14th Dist.\] 2004, pet. denied). Foreseeability requires only that the general danger, not the exact sequence of events that produced the harm, be foreseeable. Id. The Texas Supreme Court has frequently stated…