17 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2014)
…Corporation; General Electric Company; General Refractories Company; Grefco, Inc.; Henry Vogt Machine Company; Ingersoll-Rand Company; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Rapid American Corporation; Riley Power, Inc.; Triplex, Inc.; Ametek, Inc.; Uniroyal, Inc.; Viacom, Inc.; Westinghouse Electric Corporation…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 29, 2008 · in the opinion
Satterfield v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2008)
… Durabla Manufacturing Co.; Enpro Industries, Inc.; Exxon Mobil Corp.; Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.; Garock Sealing Technologies, LLC; General Electric Company; Goodrich Corp.; Guard-Line, Inc.; John Crane, Inc.; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; Northern Natural Gas Co…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · November 18, 1993 · in the opinion
Srite v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1993)
…he "gets out of breath quicker." She stated that when they went walking, Mr. Morris did not take the lead. Robert and Ellois Bledsoe Robert Bledsoe is a 57-year-old electrician. On direct examination, Mr…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 1, 2009
Union Carbide Corporation v. Smith (2009)
…Texas City; Hexion (Smith-Douglas) facility, Texas City, Texas City pipefitter and general laborer Union Carbide Texas City plant Texas City; pipefitter Union Carbide Texas City plant Texas City; pipefitter Hexion (Smith-Douglas) facility, Texas City…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 20, 2010
Uop, LLC v. Kozak (2010)
…to-warn claim against an engineering firm when the claim rests on the firm's engineering knowledge and expertise, whether the firm is sued as designer or as general contractor. Failure to Warn; Choice of Law…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · April 19, 2007 · in the opinion
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2007)
Altimore or those "similarly situated" takes the focus off Exxon's knowledge of a general danger relative to the qualities of asbestos. By focusing on epidemiological studies, the majority fails to follow our earlier pronouncement that…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · April 3, 2008
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2008)
…its conduct posed an extreme degree of risk. General knowledge of asbestos risk to employees was not evidence of knowledge of an extreme risk to employees' family members. Expert Testimony; Punitive Damages Worksites: Exxon Baytown refinery…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · November 12, 1990 · in the opinion
Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1990)
…to concurrently produce a single injury, the plaintiff may recover from the defendant for the entire injury. Shipp v. General Motors Corporation, 750 F.2d 418, 425-26 (5th Cir.1985). The plaintiff need only show…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · June 30, 2011 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Synatzske (2011)
…effect, it cannot be granted thereafter. A like general rule is that if a right to recover depends entirely upon a statute, its repeal deprives the court of jurisdiction over the subject matter. 135 Tex. 95…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · May 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Abutahoun v. Dow Chemical Company (2015)
…Thereafter, the Court adopted the RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 414 (1977) approach for imposing liability on a property owner or general contractor that controls the work of an independent contractor who is negligently injured. See Redinger…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 29, 1988 · in the opinion
Pecorino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1988)
…accrued to him not later than 1980. Furthermore, it should be noted that when the release was signed the Pecorinos did think about any exclusions or exceptions from the general, full and final release [\570] when…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Union Carbide Corporation v. Torres (2019)
…439 S.W.3d 332, 352 (Tex. 2014). Appellants do not dispute general causation. That is, they do not dispute that asbestos is capable of causing mesothelioma. However, each appellant argues that Oscar failed to establish…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · May 25, 2022 · in the opinion
EL Paso Energy Est Company v. Chevron USA Inc. (2022)
…intermediaries, controls or is controlled by or is under common control with the Person specified." (Dkt. 24-3 at p. 10). "Person" means "any natural person, corporation, general partnership, limited partnership, group, union, association, trust, court…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas · March 14, 2008 · in the opinion
Kozak v. Guard-Line, Inc. (2008)
…time of removal\[.\]" Id. at 264 (emphasis added). This court has adhered to the general rule that "some subsequent developments in a case do not affect a court's prior-existing jurisdiction." Garcia v. Boyar & Miller…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas · January 16, 2021 · in the opinion
In re United Refining Company (2021)
… Confirmation Order ¶ 6, at 9. General unsecured creditors were classified under Class VII of the Plan.\[1\] In satisfaction of Class VII claims, the Debtors, among other things, had to pay over $20 million into a…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · December 26, 2001 · in the opinion
Gilcrease v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp. (2001)
…Inc., 83 Cal.App.4th 300, 303-04, 99 Cal.Rptr.2d 476 (2000); Hall v. General Motors Corp., 229 Mich.App. 580, 582 N.W.2d 866, 871 (1998). \[4\] The Gilcreases also argue Tesoro…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 1, 2006 · in the opinion
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2006)
…9 (Tex. App.CHouston \[14th Dist.\] 2004, pet. denied). Foreseeability requires only that the general danger, not the exact sequence of events that produced the harm, be foreseeable. Id. The Texas Supreme Court has frequently stated…