17 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · November 19, 2015 · in the opinion
Wilson v. AC&S, Inc. (2015)
…2015. ECF No. 27. Plaintiff's original complaint\[1\] named Westinghouse and General Electric ("GE"), as well as 20 additional defendants\[2\] that have all since been dismissed from the case. After the cause of action…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · September 14, 2007 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Jones (2007)
…Dana Corporation; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; General Electric Company; Foster-Wheeling USA Corporation; Warren Pumps, Inc.; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Borg-Warner Corporation; Honeywell International, Inc.; Pneumo Abex Corporation; General Motors Corporation; and Genuine Parts Company. None…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · March 3, 2022 · in the opinion
Gehant v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation (2022)
…at 19.) Plaintiff argues for a more expansive definition of "required" than the three situations described in DeVries. Relying on a District of Massachusetts case, Sebright v. General Electric Co., 525 F. Supp. 3d 217 (D…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · December 21, 2016
Brinkman v. General Dynamics Corporation (2016)
…defense is available in failure-to-warn cases; this favored General Dynamics and Electric Boat over the Brinkmans. The government contractor defense is available in failure-to-warn cases, so a district court may not remand…
-
Court case · Virginia Court of Appeals · June 19, 1990 · in the opinion
Chesapeake & Potomac Tel. v. Williams (1990)
…have based the award on an average weekly wage of $215.73, the amount that claimant was earning while working for Frederick County Electric Company (FCE). We disagree and affirm the commission's award. In determining…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 4, 2005 · in the opinion
Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Little (2005)
…Commonwealth, 253 Va. 180, 182, 482 S.E.2d 810, 811-12 (1997); Mizenko v. Electric Motor & Contracting Co., 244 Va. 152, 156, 419 S.E.2d 637, 640 (1992) (citing East River S.S. Corp…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · September 14, 2012
John Crane, Inc. v. Hardick (2012)
…against John Crane, Inc., while the $1.15 million loss of society award stayed vacated. In a general maritime survival action based on a seaman's death, courts look to the Jones Act, so the decedent…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · September 8, 2015
Parker v. Hunting Point Apartments, LLC (2015)
…how or to what extent he was exposed. It found no specific act or omission by the defendants beyond a general reference to negligent construction and renovation. It also found no allegation that he had been…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · May 28, 1997
McCormick v. CE Thurston & Sons, Inc. (1997)
…aboard the ship. She sued through her ancillary administrator in Newport News state court under the Jones Act, the Death on the High Seas Act and general maritime law, alleging a failure to warn. Thurston removed…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · March 2, 2012
John Crane, Inc. v. Hardick (2012)
…whether under DOHSA, the Jones Act, or general maritime law, and a Navy sailor who contributed to the function of vessels and had a substantial connection to them is a seaman. Arguments not briefed under Rule…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 1992 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson (1992)
…omitted). See also Ford Motor Co. v. Phelps, 239 Va. 272, 276, 389 S.E.2d 454, 457 (1990); General Motors Corp. v. Lupica, 237 Va. 516, 521, 379 S.E.2d 311, 314 (1989). Additionally…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · September 28, 2018 · in the opinion
Goodrich v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)
…or videotapes of insulated pipes or systems on ships and insinuating\] that the insulation \[shown\] . . . was asbestos, in general, or amosite asbestos, in particular and that Mr. Goodrich would have been exposed to friable asbestos from. …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · April 27, 2020 · in the opinion
Mullinex v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
…§ 1333(1) and 46 U.S.C. § 30101 and the general admiralty and maritime law of the United States." ECF No. 1-4 ¶ 7. JCI does not seek to dismiss any particular claim in the Amended…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 1, 2012 · in the opinion
Gibbs v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Drydock Company (2012)
…hazard of life itself. It is difficult to imagine that the General Assembly intended to include it within the term "contract of hire," however broadly defined. For the purposes of this appeal, it is not necessary…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Minton (2013)
…Scindia, 451 U.S. at 167. Exxon argues that there was no active involvement because its supervision did not extend beyond general oversight. Using the language of the court in Dow v. Oldendorff Carriers GMBH & Co.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · August 24, 2018 · in the opinion
Goodrich v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)
…not relevant evidence of the "state of the art." JCI argues that evidence of the Navy's knowledge is a "critical component" of the general knowledge and state of the art literature concerning asbestos health hazards…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 21, 1979 · in the opinion
Caudle-Hyatt, Inc. v. Mixon (1979)
…husband's earnings. It is highly unlikely that the General Assembly intended to restrict the conclusive presumption of total dependency to instances where the spouse had demonstrated that he or she was wholly dependent. Such a…