11 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · November 19, 2015 · in the opinion
Wilson v. AC&S, Inc. (2015)
…2015. ECF No. 27. Plaintiff's original complaint\[1\] named Westinghouse and General Electric ("GE"), as well as 20 additional defendants\[2\] that have all since been dismissed from the case. After the cause of action…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · September 14, 2007 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Jones (2007)
…Dana Corporation; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company; General Electric Company; Foster-Wheeling USA Corporation; Warren Pumps, Inc.; Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Borg-Warner Corporation; Honeywell International, Inc.; Pneumo Abex Corporation; General Motors Corporation; and Genuine Parts Company. None…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · March 6, 1981 · in the opinion
Locke v. Johns-Manville (1981)
…the defendants in the November 1978 order appealed from. The record shows that since approximately 1948 plaintiff had been employed as an industrial electrician by various contractors at sites in Virginia, New York and North Carolina…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 4, 2005 · in the opinion
Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Little (2005)
…Commonwealth, 253 Va. 180, 182, 482 S.E.2d 810, 811-12 (1997); Mizenko v. Electric Motor & Contracting Co., 244 Va. 152, 156, 419 S.E.2d 637, 640 (1992) (citing East River S.S. Corp…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · October 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2018)
…a stranger, was non-fatally electrocuted when he touched defendant's transformer, "\[r\]easonable care requires those using dangerous agencies to avail themselves of the best mechanical contrivances and inventions in practical use which are effectual…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · July 31, 1986 · in the opinion
Saunders v. HK Porter Co., Inc. (1986)
…concerns over admiralty law's preemption of "state regulation of matters traditionally within the ambit of local control," 764 F.2d at 227. Tort law in general, including the statutes of limitation applicable in tort cases…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 1992 · in the opinion
Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson (1992)
…omitted). See also Ford Motor Co. v. Phelps, 239 Va. 272, 276, 389 S.E.2d 454, 457 (1990); General Motors Corp. v. Lupica, 237 Va. 516, 521, 379 S.E.2d 311, 314 (1989). Additionally…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion
Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer (2013)
…more widely used terminology in Virginia as well as the terminology used by the circuit court in this case. \[3\] Although the General Assembly later established a discovery rule for asbestos-related diseases based on diagnosis…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · April 27, 2020 · in the opinion
Mullinex v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
…§ 1333(1) and 46 U.S.C. § 30101 and the general admiralty and maritime law of the United States." ECF No. 1-4 ¶ 7. JCI does not seek to dismiss any particular claim in the Amended…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 1, 2012 · in the opinion
Gibbs v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Drydock Company (2012)
…hazard of life itself. It is difficult to imagine that the General Assembly intended to include it within the term "contract of hire," however broadly defined. For the purposes of this appeal, it is not necessary…
-
Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion
Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Minton (2013)
…Scindia, 451 U.S. at 167. Exxon argues that there was no active involvement because its supervision did not extend beyond general oversight. Using the language of the court in Dow v. Oldendorff Carriers GMBH & Co.…