14 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 9, 2016
Hoffman v. General Electric Company (2016)
The Court of Appeals reversed the superior court's CR 12(b)(6) dismissal of Larry Hoffman's claims against General Electric and Ketchikan Pulp Company and remanded, so Hoffman prevailed on the appeal, although the…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · December 11, 2008
Braaten v. Saberhagen Holdings (2008)
Vernon Braaten worked as a pipefitter on Navy ships from 1967 until 2002 and was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2003. He sued makers of pumps and valves (Buffalo Pumps, IMO as successor to DeLaval, Crane and Yarway), claiming they failed to warn of…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 10, 2008 · in the opinion
Kimball v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. (2008)
…CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.; E.J. BARTELLS SETTLEMENT TRUST; FOSTER-WHEELER ENERGY CORP.; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, a New York corporation; GOULDS PUMPS (IPG), INC.; IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., individually and as successor-in…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 24, 2022 · in the opinion
Hickson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
… ELLIOTT COMPANY, d/b/a ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY COMPANY; FOSTER WHEELER LLC; FRASER'S BOILER SERVICE, INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GOULD PUMPS (IPG), LLC; IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., individually and as successor-in interest to DE LAVAL TURBINE…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 13, 2023 · in the opinion
Holdsworth v. Scapa Waycross, Inc. (2023)
…a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; CRANE CO.; EJ BARTELLS SETTLEMENT TRUST, a Washington corporation; GARDNER DENVER NASH LLC, individually and as successor in interest to NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GOULDS…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 20, 2023 · in the opinion
Welch v. Brand Insulations, Inc. (2023)
…Inc.; Flowserve US Inc., solely as successor-in-interest to Edward Valves, Inc.; Foster Wheeler LLC; General Electric Company; Goulds Pumps (IPG), LLC; IMO Industries, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to De Laval Turbine…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 26, 2013 · in the opinion
Hoyt v. Lockheed Shipbuilding Company (2013)
…require knowledge of the specific harm, but rather that "the harm sustained must be reasonably perceived as being within the general field of danger covered by the specific duty owed by the defendant." Christen v. Lee…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 25, 2014
Ehlert v. Brand Insulations, Inc. (2014)
…liability does not apply. A trial court does not abuse its discretion by giving a general negligence instruction or excluding newspaper articles not shown to be relevant to the defendant's knowledge. Expert Testimony; Failure to…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 16, 2020 · in the opinion
Clevenger v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)
Marchevsky's answered: So basically as we put in the guidelines, in general, it's difficult to tell a sarcoma mesothelioma from other tumors, which is why we went through the trouble of putting together the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 3, 2024 · in the opinion
Monlux v. 3M Company (2024)
…1-2, 1-3. Both versions of the complaint contain only general allegations against Foster Wheeler without identifying what specific product allegedly injured Mr. Monlux at Lockheed Shipyard. Foster Wheeler notes that both versions of the…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Farrow v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)
…Technologies, L.L.C. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Garlock, Inc.); General Motors Corporation (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Harrison Thermal System and Harrison Radiator); Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Hardie-Tynes…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 31, 2011 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Aurora Pump Co. (2011)
…NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. (sued individually and as successor-in- interest to GARLOCK, INC. and US GASKET CO.); GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION; THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY; GOULDS PUMPS, INC.; HARDIE-TYNES, LLC. (sued…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · April 27, 1989 · in the opinion
Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp. (1989)
…of Trial Lawyers of America; Richard H. Robblee on behalf of United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices, amici curiae for appellants. [\638] Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Attorney General, Michael E. Tardif, Senior Assistant, and Michael Madden, Assistant…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 4, 1991 · in the opinion
Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc. (1991)
…344, 348, 693 P.2d 687 (1985): In an ordinary personal injury action, the general rule is that a cause of action "accrues" at the time the act or omission occurs. In certain torts, however, injured…