13 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 9, 2016
Hoffman v. General Electric Company (2016)
The Court of Appeals reversed the superior court's CR 12(b)(6) dismissal of Larry Hoffman's claims against General Electric and Ketchikan Pulp Company and remanded, so Hoffman prevailed on the appeal, although the…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 10, 2008 · in the opinion
Kimball v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd. (2008)
…CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.; E.J. BARTELLS SETTLEMENT TRUST; FOSTER-WHEELER ENERGY CORP.; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, a New York corporation; GOULDS PUMPS (IPG), INC.; IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., individually and as successor-in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · May 13, 2019 · in the opinion
Varney v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…Inc & ITT LLC, formerly known as ITT Corporation, Defendants, represented by Ronald C. Gardner, GARDNER TRABOLSI & ASSOC. PLLC. General Electric Company, Defendant, represented by Alice Coles Serko, TANENBAUM KEALE LLP, Christopher S. Marks, TANENBAUM KEALE LLP…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 20, 2019 · in the opinion
Hoffman v. Ketchikan Pulp Co. (2019)
…the 24 other defendants in this case, including companies that manufactured the products containing asbestos at issue, such as General Electric, settled out of court or were dismissed. The only remaining defendant is Ketchikan. Relevant here…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 31, 2010 · in the opinion
Arnold v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2010)
…Company; Transalta Centralia Generation, LLC; Trico Contracting, Inc.; Union Carbide Corporation; General Construction Co., as successor by merger to Wright Schuchart Harbor Co.; Weyerhaeuser Company, Zurn Industries LLC; and Goulds Pumps (IPG), Inc., Respondents. No. 39055…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 23, 2017 · in the opinion
Estate OF Brandes v. Brand Insulations, Inc. (2017)
…and Barbara cross-appeals the remittitur. We affirm the verdict and reverse the remittitur. FACTS Brand was an insulation subcontractor to general contractor Ralph M. Parsons (Parsons) during the construction phase of the ARCO Cherry Point…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007
Rochon v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2007)
…Rochon's employer and landowner duty theories, reversed the dismissal of her general negligence claim, and remanded for further proceedings. A defendant who takes affirmative action creating an unreasonable risk of harm has a duty to…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 1, 2022 · in the opinion
Carroll v. Akebono Brake Corporation (2022)
…and that it should be construed, not as a grant of power to make broad and general rules, but as a limitation upon the courts requiring that the customary rules having to do with the minutiæ…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 11, 2011 · in the opinion
Arnold v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2011)
…BOILER COMPANY, a division of AMERICAN RADIATOR & STANDARD SANITARY COMPANY; TRICO CONTRACTING, INC., TRANSALTA CENTRALIA GENERATION, LLC; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; GENERAL CONSTRUCTION CO.; WRIGHT SCHUCHART HARBOR CO., WEYERHAUSER COMPANY; ZURN INDUSTRIES LLC; GOULDS PUMPS (IPG), INC.;…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 26, 2023 · in the opinion
Perkins v. United States (2023)
…engaged in the "ripout" or "tearout" of asbestos. The government fails to cite any authority for this proposition. It points to general studies, but does not demonstrate that Mr. Perkins did not "ripout" or "tearout" asbestos…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion
Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2009)
…102 S.Ct. 2579, 73 L.Ed.2d 202 (1982)). \[12\] The express reservation test is similar to the rule of general retroactivity discussed by this court in pre-Robinson decisions. Haines, 87 Wash.2d at…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 17, 2018 · in the opinion
Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)
…and consortium. Id. \[25\] The Green court recognized a narrow exception to the general rule against recovery for premarital injuries in toxic exposure cases, where the injured spouse does not or cannot know of the injury…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · December 27, 2024 · in the opinion
Perkins v. United States (2024)
…Government's actionable conduct. Plaintiff did not meet this burden of proof by presenting general evidence that there was asbestos work performed at H.J.'s worksite or expert testimony that H.J. would have been…