No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

570 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 29

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 6, 2020

    Rivera v. General Electric Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    The trial court denied General Electric's motion for summary judgment on workers' compensation exclusivity grounds and, alternatively, on punitive damages, so plaintiffs' claims against GE proceed. Workers' compensation exclusivity bars only injuries arising from employment…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · August 9, 2021

    Paroni EX rel. Estate OF Paroni v. General Electric UK Holdings Ltd. (2021)

    …in New York. Jurisdictional discovery showed that General Electric UK Holdings Ltd (GEUKH) held the Ruston liabilities. GEUKH moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court agreed. It found no general jurisdiction, because GEUKH…

  3. Court case · Maryland Appellate Court · February 8, 2024

    Basil-Flippen v. General Electric Company (2024)

    …Campbell Company installing asbestos insulation on a turbine at the Morgantown Generating Station in Maryland. The turbine was sold to the Potomac Electric Power Company by Westinghouse, which also had a separate contract to install it…

  4. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · January 23, 2023

    McDERMID v. 3M Company (2023)

    The Appellate Division affirmed summary judgment for General Electric and CBS Corp. (successor to Westinghouse) against the McDermid plaintiffs' negligent supervision claims and held the remaining claims time-barred by the statute of repose. A turbine…

  5. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 21, 2009

    Fagerholm v. Gen. Elec. Co., Inc. (2009)

    The court of appeals affirmed the trial court's protective order limiting discovery and its summary judgment for General Electric, rejecting Beverly Fagerholm's employer intentional tort claim. To prove an employer intentional tort under Fyffe…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 31, 2023

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)

    The federal district court denied summary judgment motions by General Electric, ViacomCBS, Air & Liquid Systems and Warren Pumps, and granted the Elorreaga family's motion for partial summary judgment that the government contractor defense does not…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 7, 2022

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2022)

    The court granted General Electric and ViacomCBS's motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' claims for punitive damages and loss of consortium damages under general maritime law, but denied it as to the California negligence and strict…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 7, 2015

    Haas v. 3M Company (2015)

    The Third Circuit vacated the District Court's summary judgment for General Electric, which Haas had appealed, and remanded for further proceedings. It also held the District Court did not abuse its discretion in admitting Brasmer…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 23, 2012

    Najolia v. Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. (2012)

    …s motion to remand, holding that General Electric and CBS Corporation (Westinghouse) properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. A defendant may remove under the federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 17, 2017

    McClung v. 3M Company (2017)

    The court severed the claims against General Electric and transferred them to the Southern District of West Virginia, granting General Electric's request and denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction as moot…

  11. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · March 4, 2009

    Mason v. Mt. St. Joseph, Inc. (2009)

    The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's dismissal of the estate's claims against General Electric, holding they were not product liability civil actions and were therefore barred by Oregon's 10-year negligence…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 2, 2003

    Lindstrom v. AC Products Liability Trust (2003)

    …Wheeler, Aurora Pump, Gulf Engineering, Ingersoll Rand, Walworth, Crosby Valve, General Electric, Warren Pumps, Crane, A.W. Chesterton and Coffin Turbo Pump, and dismissed Lindstrom's claims against them with prejudice. Under maritime product liability law…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 25, 2010

    Miranda v. Abex Corp. (2010)

    Four plaintiffs, Ernesto Miranda, Antonio DiBenedetto, Lutz Sommer and Gordon Cheney, sued Abex Corporation and other companies in New York County. They alleged they had mesothelioma from asbestos exposure, and two of the four had died. Miranda and…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · September 30, 2015

    Hedden v. CBS Corporation (2015)

    The court granted summary judgment to Crown Cork & Seal, CBS, General Electric, Gardner Denver, Link-Belt and Riley Power, and denied it to Crane Co. and John Crane, Inc. on the maritime claims, so the Heddens…

  15. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 19, 2014

    Rost v. Ford Motor Company (2014)

    Richard Rost and his wife Joyce sued Ford Motor Company and other defendants, alleging that asbestos exposure caused his mesothelioma. All defendants except Ford settled before trial. Rost testified that in 1950 he worked for several months at a…

  16. Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · March 2, 2016

    Myers v. Crouse-Hinds Division OF Cooper Industries, Inc. (2016)

    The Indiana Supreme Court affirmed the denial of summary judgment to General Electric and Owens-Illinois in the Geyman case and reversed summary judgment for Crouse-Hinds and the other defendants in the Myers case, so…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 3, 2015

    Spychalla v. Boeing Aerospace Operations Inc. (2015)

    The district court denied summary judgment to Boeing, Cessna and General Electric, granted and denied the motions in limine in part, and allowed Boeing to file a late government contractor defense motion. The court did not…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · May 8, 2003

    Plumb v. AC and S., Inc. (2003)

    The Appellate Division affirmed the order setting aside the jury's apportionment of 98% of fault to General Electric, a ruling that left Sears, Roebuck, the appellant, responsible for the verdict; two justices concurred and one…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 6, 2017

    Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2017)

    …Graham and Dr. Taragin may give general causation testimony but not specific causation opinions that the defendants' products did not cause Mr. Bell's mesothelioma. A "one-size-fits-all" specific causation opinion that draws no…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 24, 2014

    Haas v. 3M Company (2014)

    …continued the case after his death. This opinion decided summary judgment motions by Boeing, General Electric and Goodyear. The court held that Boeing was protected by the government contractor defense, because the Air Force collaborated on…