No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

93 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 5

  1. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007

    General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)

    The Kentucky Supreme Court held that General Electric was not entitled to summary judgment on its exclusive-remedy defense and that nine of the sixteen premises owners in the Rehm case were, with seven owners' claims…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · May 8, 2003

    Plumb v. AC and S., Inc. (2003)

    The Appellate Division affirmed the order setting aside the jury's apportionment of 98% of fault to General Electric, a ruling that left Sears, Roebuck, the appellant, responsible for the verdict; two justices concurred and one…

  3. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · September 28, 2020

    Gibbs v. 84 Lumber Company (2020)

    … Design Defect; Sophisticated User and Intermediary Defenses; Choice of Law Worksites: General Electric Large Steam Turbine Division; Deforest Company; home renovations with his father; General Plumbing job sites laborer, plumber, and shade tree mechanic Deforest Company…

  4. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    Rettig v. Gen. Motors Corp. (2006)

    …responsible for taking asbestos fiber from bags and mixing it in five gallon buckets with a substance called Glyptal, which was made by General Electric. He then applied the mixture to the generator's spark plugs. {…

  5. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)

    …and Doyle, P. J., concur. \[1\] We note that this Court granted General Electric Company's motion to withdraw its appeal from Case No. A11A2025. \[2\] OCGA § 51-12-33 (d) provides as follows: (d) (1…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2014)

    …CertainTeed Corporation, Selby, Battersby & Company, Foster Wheeler Corporation, Pfizer Corporation, Schneider Electric USA, Inc., General Electric Company, The Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Conwed Corporation, CBS Corporation, John Crane-Houdaille Inc…

  7. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 11, 2024 · in the opinion

    Olson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2024)

    …INC.; FRYER-KNOWLES INC. a Washington corporation; GARDNER DENVER, INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.; GENERAL REFRACTORIES CO.; THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO., individually and as successor-in-interest to THE DURABLA MFG. CO.; GOULDS PUMPS, INC.; HARBISON…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 31, 1982 · in the opinion

    Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd. (1982)

    …cite the cases of Toppi v. United States, 332 F.Supp. 513 (E.D.Pa.1971) and Lockett v. General Electric Co., 376 F.Supp. 1201 (E.D.Pa.1974), aff'd, 511 F.2d 1394 …

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Trumbull v. American Biltrite (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2017)

    …Dept. 1982\] \[4-7% sales in New York generating between $40,000-$113,000\]; Allen v. Canadian General Electric Co., 65 AD2d 39 \[3d Dept 1978\]\[1% sales in New York, generating nine million dollars\]). Here…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 21, 2016 · in the opinion

    Baeza v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)

    …BACKGROUND According to the general allegations of the operative fourth amended complaint, David was then a 54-year-old male with mesothelioma who was environmentally exposed as a bystander to asbestos fibers supplied by Special Electric…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Melendrez v. Superior Court OF State OF California (2013)

    …subd. (b).) The reason for this waiver should be obvious. As a general matter, when an individual verifies discovery responses, further discovery can be directed to that individual to determine the sources for the initial responses…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Friedman v. AO Smith Corp. (2013)

    …breakers, as well as specialty and explosion-proof equipment. Among other things, Mr. Friedman testified that he purchased electrical supplies and equipment from Graybar. In this regard, Mr. Friedman testified as follows (plaintiffs' exhibit B, pp…

  13. Court case · Connecticut Appellate Court · March 7, 2023 · in the opinion

    Dusto v. Rogers Corporation (2023)

    …179-80. In Connecticut, the legislature enacted workers' compensation legislation that included a broad exclusivity provision with no express exceptions for intentional torts of the employer. See General Statutes § 31-284 (a). The legislature also elected…

  14. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · December 5, 2012

    Martinez v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co. (2012)

    …and Workers' Compensation; Successor Liability; Punitive Damages; Venue, Removal and Transfer; Choice of Law; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: DASRL textile plant, Berazategui, Berazategui electrician in the Nylon division DASRL textile plant, Berazategui Berazategui 1963-1980

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 5, 2018

    Matter of Adesso v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2018)

    …Brooklyn Navy Yard Brooklyn 1953-1957; boilermaker, truck mechanic, and general helper Thatcher Glass Elmira 1957-1996; fireman USS Des Moines 1957-1961; boiler maintenance mechanic Happauge School District 1976-1982; welder USS Mindoro 1948-1952…

  16. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 12, 2024 · in the opinion

    Cockrum v. Murphy (2024)

    JEFFREY L. COCKRUM and DONNA COCKRUM, husband and wife, Appellants, v. C.H. MURPHY/CLARK-ULLMAN, INC.; NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY; METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; PFIZER, INC.; P-G INDUSTRIES, INC., as successor-in-interest to…

  17. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 31, 1990 · in the opinion

    Celotex Corp. v. Tate (1990)

    …into a hopper, scooped it from the hopper onto a scale, and carried it to the mixer. Tate also worked as an electrician at the plant, and the evidence reflected that, in this capacity, he was…

  18. Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · May 8, 2024 · in the opinion

    Beverage v. Alcoa, Inc. (2024)

    …226 (noting land can have multiple possessors). We are not persuaded by Alcoa's claim that failing to modify its general duty of care as a land possessor will lead to a drastic spike in lawsuits…

  19. Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · June 17, 2022 · in the opinion

    Beverage v. Alcoa, Inc. (2022)

    …manufacturers started seeking bankruptcy protection. See Hanlon at 668 ("In the late 1980s, premises cases began to be brought against electric utilities, and in the 1990s they extended to other kinds of companies, including paper mills…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …The court explained that the employer was a "sophisticated organization" and it did not have to be "told that gasoline is volatile and that sparks from an electrical connection or friction can cause ignition." (Ibid.) Subsequently…