No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

54 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 3

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 7, 2015

    Haas v. 3M Company (2015)

    The Third Circuit vacated the District Court's summary judgment for General Electric, which Haas had appealed, and remanded for further proceedings. It also held the District Court did not abuse its discretion in admitting Brasmer…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · September 25, 2019

    McClung v. 3M Company (2019)

    The district court denied Plaintiff's objections, adopted the magistrate judge's recommendations as modified, found no personal jurisdiction over General Electric or Boeing, denied their motions to dismiss, and severed and transferred the claims against…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 17, 2017

    McClung v. 3M Company (2017)

    The court severed the claims against General Electric and transferred them to the Southern District of West Virginia, granting General Electric's request and denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction as moot…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 3, 2015

    Spychalla v. Boeing Aerospace Operations Inc. (2015)

    The district court denied summary judgment to Boeing, Cessna and General Electric, granted and denied the motions in limine in part, and allowed Boeing to file a late government contractor defense motion. The court did not…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 24, 2014

    Haas v. 3M Company (2014)

    …continued the case after his death. This opinion decided summary judgment motions by Boeing, General Electric and Goodyear. The court held that Boeing was protected by the government contractor defense, because the Air Force collaborated on…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia · April 20, 2009 · in the opinion

    Hamrick v. A & I Company (2009)

    …a Durametallic Corp. and GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC f/k/a Garlock, Inc. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and GOODRICH CORPORATION and as successor-in-interest to Goodrich-Gulf Chemical, Inc. f/k/a…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · February 8, 2011 · in the opinion

    Glein v. Boeing Company (2011)

    …known as VIACOM, Inc., formerly known as WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP.; CERTAIN-TEED CORP.; CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.; DANA CORP.; CEERE & COMPANY; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GEORGIA…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 25, 2010 · in the opinion

    Glein v. Boeing Company (2010)

    …a Viacom, Inc. f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corp.; Certain Teed Corp.; Crown Cork & Seal Co.; Dana Corp.; Deere & Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC; General Dynamics Corp.; General Electric Co.; Georgia Pacific, LLC…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · April 12, 2007 · in the opinion

    Hilbert v. Aeroquip, Inc. (2007)

    …the language used is identical to the language used in an affidavit of David Hobson, which was submitted by General Electric Co. in the case of Nesbiet v. General Electric Co., 399 F.Supp.2d 205…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · May 27, 2015 · in the opinion

    Schwartz v. Abex Corp. (2015)

    …other points of law), Chicano v. General Electric Co., 2004 WL 2250990 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 5, 2004) (O'Neill, J.), and In re Asbestos Products Liability Litig. (Hoffeditz v. AM General, LLC), 2011 WL 5881008 …

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · September 30, 2009 · in the opinion

    In re Asbestos Litigation v. Adel Wiggins Group (2009)

    …products. \[8\] Compare, e.g., the affidavits submitted by General Electric Company in Kirks v. General Electric Company, Civ. No. 08-856-SLR, (D. Del. Sept. 17, 2009) and Wiersma v. General Electric Company, Civ. No…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · June 18, 2020 · in the opinion

    Kruse v. Actuant Corporation (2020)

    … 3.) After his military service, Mr. Jimenez was "honorably discharged as the civilian equivalent of a Certified Aircraft Electrical Mechanic and Technician." (Id.) Apart from his service, Mr. Jimenez also "performed both supervisorial and hands-on…

  13. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · March 12, 2001 · in the opinion

    Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock v. Stilley (2001)

    …the Act and passes constitutional muster, we deny the employer's petition. I. Lyman Stilley worked for Newport News as an electrician's helper for about nine months in the 1950s. During his employment at Newport…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …The court explained that the employer was a "sophisticated organization" and it did not have to be "told that gasoline is volatile and that sparks from an electrical connection or friction can cause ignition." (Ibid.) Subsequently…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)

    …appropriate. Appellants assert that a determination as to whether there was insufficient knowledge of the manufacturer or of the scientific field in general would have been relevant in order to determine whether the Kent cigarettes, and…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · May 16, 2013 · in the opinion

    Scearce v. 3M Company (2013)

    …alleged that "\[f\]rom approximately 1983 to 2004, Mr. Scearce was exposed to asbestos-containing products while conducting electric repair work at various Air Force base sites, including McGuire Air Force Base in New Jersey. Mr…

  17. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 18, 2017 · in the opinion

    Macaluso v. A.O. Smith Corp. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …rock, floor tiles, and electrical equipment), and also while employed as a plumber's helper (from boilers and boiler insulation) during the period 1972 to 1982. Eugene Story-(deceased) Was exposed to Asbestos dust from valves…

  18. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 1984 · in the opinion

    Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)

    …Cf. Andries v. General Motors Corp., 444 So.2d 1180, 1183 (La.1983) (affirming trial court's jury instructions that "manufacturer of a product must give an adequate warning of any danger inherent in any product…

  19. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2017 · in the opinion

    Brooks v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …to asbestos in the following manner: Ronald Brooks: (Living with Lung Cancer) Exposed to Asbestos while working as a construction worker, fireman, and during service as electrician's mate in the U.S. Navy, (1974-1989)…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 8, 2021

    Carnes v. General Dynamics Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2021)

    The magistrate judge recommended granting General Dynamics' motion for summary judgment against the Carnes plaintiffs because they produced no evidence that Mr. Carnes was exposed to an asbestos-containing product attributable to General Dynamics. Under Texas…