23 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · June 22, 2015 · in the opinion
Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2015)
…units are General Electric boiling water reactors. They produce electricity by splitting uranium atoms, and the heat generated by that process boils water, producing steam that is piped to turbines, which spin generators to produce electricity.…
-
Court case · Missouri Court of Appeals · September 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Hayden v. Cut-Zaven, Ltd. (2020)
…hair dryers while working for Employers: Conair "Pro Style," Clairol "Son of a Gun," and "General Electric Power Turbo." He testified he believed asbestos was used around the hair dryer coils as a heat-reduction mechanism…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · November 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Crane Co. v. DeLisle (2016)
…Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S.Ct. 2786, 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993), General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 118 S.Ct. 512, 139 L.Ed.2d 508…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2003 · in the opinion
Dekens v. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (2003)
…2d 916.) Centaur Manufacturing made a plastic plumbing pipe that was approved for listing by IAPMO in 1984 and 1985. (FNS Mortgage Service Corp. v. Pacific General Group, Inc., supra, 24 Cal.App.4th at p…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion
Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)
…The court explained that the employer was a "sophisticated organization" and it did not have to be "told that gasoline is volatile and that sparks from an electrical connection or friction can cause ignition." (Ibid.) Subsequently…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 28, 2000 · in the opinion
Hollingsworth v. Connor (2000)
…appropriate. Appellants assert that a determination as to whether there was insufficient knowledge of the manufacturer or of the scientific field in general would have been relevant in order to determine whether the Kent cigarettes, and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · October 29, 2013 · in the opinion
Bobo v. Agco Corp. (2013)
…\[and\] ... an implied restriction of the general authority is necessary to avoid grave interference with the performance of a governmental function, or that for other reasons it was plainly the purpose of Congress to use the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · October 28, 2013 · in the opinion
Bobo v. Agco Corporation (2013)
….. an implied restriction of the general authority is necessary to avoid grave interference with the performance of a governmental function, or that for other reasons it was plainly the purpose of Congress to use the \sue…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 6, 2022
Zicklin v. Bergdorf Goodman Inc. (2022)
The trial court denied Colgate-Palmolive's motion for summary judgment because conflicting expert opinions on general and specific causation raised fact issues; the plaintiff prevailed on the motion. Conflicting expert opinions on whether the product…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · October 15, 2018 · in the opinion
DeLisle v. Crane Co. (2018)
…in every proceeding. However, this Court's case law makes clear that a proper and thorough application of Frye allows the trial judge to inquire [\1235] beyond bare assertions of general acceptance. Daubert, on the other…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 9, 2008
Barnes v. AO Smith Water Products Co. (2008)
…the Montross, Perdicaro, Enea and Iqbal cases separate, over the defendants' general opposition. Under CPLR 602(a), actions with common questions of law or fact may be tried jointly. The Malcolm factors guide the choice, and…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · January 4, 2024 · in the opinion
Corin v. Arkema, Inc. (2024)
…MRW. January 4, 2024. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge. Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order Re: Plaintiff's Motion for Remand \[DE 26\] I. INTRODUCTION On October 31…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · February 14, 2014 · in the opinion
McGuire v. Lorillard Tobacco Company (2014)
…been a strictly personal choice, yet it was a thing of comfort and convenience to himself while he was serving as maintenance man and general custodian and while he was on call at all hours. Therefore…
-
Blog · 2022
Kent Asbestos Cigarette Filters: Danger Upon Danger
…The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement Then, in 1998, the Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement was entered into by the attorneys general of 46 states and the four largest U.S. tobacco companies. These big four comprised Philip…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 12, 2018 · in the opinion
Prokocimer v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)
…continuing general belief that exposure to asbestos below the TLV of the time period of 5 million particles per cubit foot ("mppcf") of air did not represent a hazard to workers. There was no general recognition…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 2014 · in the opinion
Ward v. Goss-Jewett Co. OF Northern California (2014)
…million in general damages for emotional distress, pain and suffering and the remainder in special damages for medical expenses and loss of earnings. The general damages awarded did not exceed the $6 million in general damages…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 1998 · in the opinion
Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)
…The "minimum contacts" prong of the test can be broken down into two types of personal jurisdiction, specific and general. A state exercises "specific jurisdiction" over a non-resident defendant when the lawsuit arises from or…
-
Court case · Utah Court of Appeals · June 20, 2019 · in the opinion
Felix v. Novelis Corp. (2019)
…6 The district court denied the motion. It ruled that the Estate failed to establish general jurisdiction\[2\] but concluded that the Estate submitted sufficient evidence to support specific jurisdiction. The court found that the evidence…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 30, 2018 · in the opinion
Steiner v. Hollingsworth & Vose Company (2018)
…s Brief, at 1. "Collateral review is appropriate, despite the general directive that appellate courts conduct review only of final orders, if an order is (1) separable from and collateral to the main cause of action, …
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · April 13, 1999 · in the opinion
Ruckstuhl v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)
…regard to either theory. The facts presented in this case show that H & V and Lorillard had a much closer relationship than that of a general component part manufacturer supplying parts to an end product manufacturer…