44 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 3
-
Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 23, 2007
General Elec. Co. v. Cain (2007)
The Kentucky Supreme Court held that General Electric was not entitled to summary judgment on its exclusive-remedy defense and that nine of the sixteen premises owners in the Rehm case were, with seven owners' claims…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · May 8, 2003
Plumb v. AC and S., Inc. (2003)
The Appellate Division affirmed the order setting aside the jury's apportionment of 98% of fault to General Electric, a ruling that left Sears, Roebuck, the appellant, responsible for the verdict; two justices concurred and one…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 11, 2024 · in the opinion
Olson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2024)
…INC.; FRYER-KNOWLES INC. a Washington corporation; GARDNER DENVER, INC.; GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.; GENERAL REFRACTORIES CO.; THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO., individually and as successor-in-interest to THE DURABLA MFG. CO.; GOULDS PUMPS, INC.; HARBISON…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Trumbull v. American Biltrite (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2017)
…Dept. 1982\] \[4-7% sales in New York generating between $40,000-$113,000\]; Allen v. Canadian General Electric Co., 65 AD2d 39 \[3d Dept 1978\]\[1% sales in New York, generating nine million dollars\]). Here…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 5, 2018
Matter of Adesso v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2018)
…Brooklyn Navy Yard Brooklyn 1953-1957; boilermaker, truck mechanic, and general helper Thatcher Glass Elmira 1957-1996; fireman USS Des Moines 1957-1961; boiler maintenance mechanic Happauge School District 1976-1982; welder USS Mindoro 1948-1952…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 12, 2024 · in the opinion
Cockrum v. Murphy (2024)
JEFFREY L. COCKRUM and DONNA COCKRUM, husband and wife, Appellants, v. C.H. MURPHY/CLARK-ULLMAN, INC.; NORTH COAST ELECTRIC COMPANY; METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; PFIZER, INC.; P-G INDUSTRIES, INC., as successor-in-interest to…
-
Court case · Iowa Court of Appeals · May 8, 2024 · in the opinion
Beverage v. Alcoa, Inc. (2024)
…226 (noting land can have multiple possessors). We are not persuaded by Alcoa's claim that failing to modify its general duty of care as a land possessor will lead to a drastic spike in lawsuits…
-
Court case · Iowa Supreme Court · June 17, 2022 · in the opinion
Beverage v. Alcoa, Inc. (2022)
…manufacturers started seeking bankruptcy protection. See Hanlon at 668 ("In the late 1980s, premises cases began to be brought against electric utilities, and in the 1990s they extended to other kinds of companies, including paper mills…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 6, 1995 · in the opinion
Harris v. AC & S, Inc. (1995)
…822 (1971); Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co., 313 U.S. 487, 61 S.Ct. 1020, 85 L.Ed. 1477 (1941); Clarin Corp. v. Massachusetts General Life Ins. Co., 44 F.3d 471, 474 (7th…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 22, 1996
Egan v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. (1996)
…appeals court affirmed the bench-trial judgment against Owens-Corning Fiberglass (OCF), including the $350,000 general damages award and the set-off ruling, and rejected the plaintiff's request for punitive damages under Ohio law.…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 11, 2019
Bagwell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2019)
…were not at fault and the trial court's evidence and instruction rulings, but raised the survival-action general damages against RMC Holdings, increasing the total award from $1,265,000 to $1,498,333.34…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · May 8, 2017
Coleman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2017)
…52 and topic 40 (pre-1972 only) and denying the general dust and post-employment topics. Rule 30(b)(6) topics must be relevant and proportional; general 'dust' topics were cumulative of the asbestos-specific topics…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 12, 2010
McGUFFIE v. Mead Corp. (2010)
…for its subsidiary's acts absent alter-ego control or proof that it assumed a duty of workplace safety, and general safety oversight and correspondence do not show such an assumption. Premises Owner Liability; Successor Liability…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion
Hebert v. Anco Insulation, Inc. (2002)
…Ed.2d 379 (1994). Only if the appellate court finds an abuse of that discretion may it examine prior awards of general damages to determine the amount the trier of fact reasonable could award. Theriot v…
-
Court case · North Carolina Court of Appeals · December 3, 2013 · in the opinion
Wise v. Alcoa, Inc. (2013)
The General Statutes provide that "the full Commission shall review the award, and, if good ground be shown therefor, reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, rehear the parties or their representatives, and, if proper, amend the…
-
Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 11, 2014 · in the opinion
Bostic v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. (2014)
If the plaintiff proves general causation with reliable scientific evidence that approximately 400 milligrams of the medication can cause death in children, the plaintiff will be able to prove specific causation in at least two ways…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · September 9, 2008 · in the opinion
Satterfield v. Breeding Insulation Company (2008)
By requiring judges to determine general foreseeability, the majority's opinion forces trial judges to base their decision-making on a razor thin distinction and encourages judges to make factual determinations relevant to breach of duty…
-
Court case · Arizona Supreme Court · May 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Quiroz v. Alcoa Inc. (2018)
First, whether it falls under the general auspices of "negligence" or "liability," both the Family and the dissent are in fact using cases and Restatement sections premised on foreseeability to create a new duty. Second, by…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 26, 2010 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Bostic (2010)
Maddox's opinion is insufficient as to specific causation. Id. at 839. Here, appellees endeavor to rely on material practice simulation studies performed by their general causation expert, William Longo, Ph.D., a material scientist. Dr…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 25, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Wilhite (2009)
…at most, that the plaintiffs are suing the same defendant for injuries caused by asbestos exposure at the same general location during the same period of time, but the documents do not show that these injuries…