20 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 15, 2023
Warrington v. 3M Company (2023)
The court granted General Electric's motion for summary judgment, dismissing all claims and crossclaims against GE with prejudice and ruling against plaintiffs Robert and Joan Warrington. Under maritime law, a plaintiff must show exposure to…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 13, 2023 · in the opinion
Holdsworth v. Scapa Waycross, Inc. (2023)
…a Pennsylvania corporation, f/k/a WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION; CRANE CO.; EJ BARTELLS SETTLEMENT TRUST, a Washington corporation; GARDNER DENVER NASH LLC, individually and as successor in interest to NASH ENGINEERING COMPANY; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GOULDS…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 24, 2011 · in the opinion
State EX rel. Roger Bacon High School v. Indus. Comm. OF Ohio (2011)
…Technologies, LLC, RPM, Inc., RPM International, Inc., Bondex International, Inc., C.P. Hall, Alliedsignal, 3M Company, CBS Corp., General Electric, Georgia-Pacific, Peerless, Fidelity Builders, Supply, Inc., R. E. Kramig & Co., Inc., A. W. Chesterton, McGraw…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion
Ballard v. Anchor Packing Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2009)
…and floor tilers, pipe fitters, boiler workers, and electrician. Robert Killenberger Mr. Robert Killenberger recently died from mesothelioma at the age of 65. Mr. Killenberger was allegedly exposed to asbestos primarily from the variety of jobs…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 5, 2015 · in the opinion
Assenzio v. Burnham (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)
…Nutmeg Technologies, Inc., 43 AD3d 599, 602 \[3rd Dept 2007\]). The link between asbestos and disease, general causation, is well documented. In re New York Asbestos Litigation (Marshall), 28 AD3d 255 (1st Dept. 2006). The First…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · March 30, 1983 · in the opinion
Austin v. Unarco Industries, Inc. (1983)
…appears that the tests are the same, since, in general "\[o\]nce admiralty jurisdiction is established, then all of the substantive rules and precepts peculiar to the law of the sea become applicable." Brance v. Shumann…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 13, 2017 · in the opinion
Brooks v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…to asbestos in the following manner: Ronald Brooks: (Living with Lung Cancer) Exposed to Asbestos while working as a construction worker, fireman, and during service as electrician's mate in the U.S. Navy, (1974-1989)…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 28, 2011
Webster v. Exxonmobil Oil Corp. (2011)
…defeat a nonsuit; without evidence of exposure there is no causation. Causation; Product Identification; Expert Testimony; Premises Owner Liability; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Mobil Torrance refinery (General Petroleum); Mobil refinery, Torrance, Torrance; U.S. Navy…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 28, 2017 · in the opinion
American Home Assur. Co. v. Port Auth. of NY & NJ (2017)
…American Home Assurance Company (American Home) seeks declaratory relief to determine its rights and obligations under a general liability insurance policy issued to defendant The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (the Port Authority…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 14, 1995 · in the opinion
Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1995)
…the petit jury venire. The Supreme Court announced a general rule that "\[t\]he denial or impairment of the right \[to exercise peremptory challenges\] is reversible error without a showing of prejudice." Swain, 380 U.S…
-
Occupation
painters | Mesothelioma Claims
…use was to keep paint from settling hard in the can (Asbestos, July 1920). It had "won general favor" in prepared paints of all types. High-grade paint formulas averaged "about fifteen per cent" of what…
-
Court case · Kansas Supreme Court · April 10, 1992 · in the opinion
Harding v. KC Wall Products, Inc. (1992)
…the time the action was filed applies. It is a well-settled rule of law that "statutes complete in themselves, relating to a specific thing, take precedence over general statutes." Szoboszlay v. Glessner, 233 Kan. 475…
-
Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · January 18, 2012 · in the opinion
Singer v. Pneumo Abex, LLC. (2012)
…product was ever, at any time, delivered to the National Avenue plant in general or to Building 35 in particular; • Any of Abex's brake shoes were ever present at the National Avenue plant, nor specifically…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)
…a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion
Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)
…a union composed of plasterers, cement masons, and shophands. The study described plasterers' job duties as follows: Plasterers, in general, are responsible for all interior and exterior plastering of drywall, cement, stucco, and stone imitation as…
-
Court case · Maine Supreme Judicial Court · January 17, 1984 · in the opinion
Austin v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1984)
…at 799; Prosser, supra at 522. Recent cases typified by Daly v. General Motors Corp., 20 Cal.3d 725, 575 P.2d 1162, 144 Cal.Rptr. 380 (1978) (ordinary contributory negligence of plaintiff to be considered…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Aquitato v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 10, 2022 · in the opinion
Katechis v. Allied Bldg. Prods. Corp. (2022)
…exposure to a toxin, that the toxin is capable of causing the particular illness (general causation) and that plaintiff was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation). Where we depart…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · May 2, 1991 · in the opinion
Harding v. Proko Industries, Inc. (1991)
…find Kansas or Texas law to be applicable to the plaintiff's claims. Section 6(2) of the Second Restatement identifies seven general considerations which are relevant to the resolution of a given conflict of laws…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · April 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Rocha v. Brown & Gould, LLP (2015)
…which the alleged legal malpractice occurred — is terminated; consequently, "subsequent general representation of the plaintiffs regarding matters unrelated to the initial transaction does not warrant the application of the doctrine." De May v. Moore & Bruce, LLP…