No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · September 29, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2015)

    …at 446. Several of the manufacturers, including Crane and OCF \[Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation\], moved for summary judgments on the ground that there was insufficient evidence linking the plaintiffs' injuries to any particular manufacturer's product…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir. 1986) (causation in asbestos case requires "evidence of exposure to a specific product ... in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked"); Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · June 22, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bobo v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2015)

    …held under maritime law that proof that defendant's asbestos-containing product caused plaintiff's injuries is an essential element to any claim based on asbestos exposure") (citing Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · January 28, 2010

    Corley v. Long-Lewis, Inc. (2010)

    The magistrate judge denied the Corleys' motion to remand, holding that Garlock and Owens-Illinois properly removed on federal enclave grounds and CBS/Westinghouse on federal officer grounds, so the case stayed in federal court. A…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · March 24, 2016

    Holland v. Airco, Inc. (2016)

    …and Goulds Pumps, ending the plaintiff's claims over Owen Holland's mesothelioma death. Under Alabama law a plaintiff must first prove exposure to an asbestos-containing product for which the defendant is responsible. Evidence that…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute," such that defendants who made products…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · August 30, 2013 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. Bill Vann Company, Inc. (2013)

    …a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute," such that defendants who made products…