No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

7 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · Arizona Supreme Court · November 19, 1982

    Nelson v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona (1982)

    Marguerite Nelson sought Arizona workers' compensation death benefits after her husband Charles, an insulation worker who had handled asbestos for many years, died of mesothelioma in January 1977. She filed her claim in October 1979, almost three…

  2. Court case · Arizona Court of Appeals · May 19, 2016 · in the opinion

    City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc. (2016)

    …may prevent the City from acting "on the public's behalf and for the public's benefit." See Tucson Unified Sch. Dist. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 174 Ariz. 336, 337 (1993) (holding A.R.S…

  3. Exposure sites · Arizona

    Arizona Asbestos Exposure Sites: Worksites, Industries, and Trust Coverage

    …boilers) J.T. Thorpe (California): 85 entries (insulation and refractory contracting) Fibreboard: 69 entries (Pabco pipe and block insulation) Owens Corning: 64 entries (Kaylo and high-temperature pipe and block insulation) W.R. Grace: 47 entries…

  4. State law · Arizona

    Arizona Mesothelioma Lawyer: Asbestos Claims, Deadlines & Compensation

    …Fibreboard, J.T. Thorpe (California), Owens Corning, and Johns-Manville — from 1954 through 1982. The order and timing of the trust filings and the lawsuit are decided with the trial team, and the trust claims are…

  5. Court case · Arizona Court of Appeals · September 20, 2016 · in the opinion

    Quiroz v. Alcoa Inc. (2016)

    …D. Pa. 2014) (finding that an employer and an employee's spouse who contracted mesothelioma due to take-home exposure were "legal strangers" under the law of negligence); Adams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 119 Md. App…

  6. Court case · Arizona Supreme Court · May 11, 2018

    Quiroz v. Alcoa Inc. (2018)

    …statutes), not on foreseeability or presumed risk creation. An employer therefore owes no duty to a worker's child for take-home asbestos, and the Third Restatement's duty framework is rejected. Take-Home Exposure; Wrongful…

  7. Court case · Arizona Court of Appeals · April 17, 2012 · in the opinion

    Pounders v. Enserch E & C, Inc. (2012)

    …Beazer East, Inc., 219 Mich.App. 405, 557 N.W.2d 127, 132 (1996) (rejecting plaintiff's argument that entity that designed, manufactured, and installed coke ovens was a "supplier" for purposes of statute of repose).