No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

24 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion

    Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)

    Such evidence is simply not "of sufficient weight to support a reasonable inference of causation." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 656; see also McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., supra…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …supra, 205 Cal.App.4th at p. 88; Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1668), and we have no cause to address them here. While considerations about the current leadership…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …supra, 205 Cal.App.4th at p. 88; Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1668), and we have no cause to address them here. While considerations about the current leadership…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014)

    …supra, 205 Cal.App.4th at p. 88; Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1668 \[57 Cal.Rptr.2d 525\]), and we have no cause to address them here. While…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)

    …person standard. It stresses that negligence, even in a failure-to-warn context, requires proof of the standard of care (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994-995, 1001-1004), and…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 22, 2017 · in the opinion

    Turley v. Familian Corporation (2017)

    …Kaiser Gypsum Co. (2002) 98 Cal.App.4th 1098, and Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650. Neither does. McGonnell affirmed a summary judgment because the deposition excerpt by declarant plaintiff…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 17, 2000 · in the opinion

    Ashdown v. Ameron International Corp. (2000)

    …the date of the decedent's injury as a matter of law. Appellants cite the Supreme Court's opinion in Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438…

  8. Court case · California Supreme Court · May 23, 2016 · in the opinion

    Webb v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)

    …of Product Defects The law has long recognized three types of product defects: manufacturing defects, design defects, and "\warning defects.'" (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 (Anderson); see Barker v…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 21, 2016 · in the opinion

    Baeza v. Special Electric Company, Inc. (2016)

    …employer had no liability for plaintiff's injuries beyond payment of workers' compensation benefits\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1198 \[applied Proposition 51 to strict liability asbestos case\].) Defendant…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Mata v. Liberty Utilities (park Water) Corp. (2020)

    …2019) 37 Cal.App.5th 292, 332.) III. Section 3294 Punitive damages serve the dual public purposes of punishment and deterrence. (Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1658; see § 3294…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2024 · in the opinion

    Williams v. JM Manufacturing Company, Inc. (2024)

    …to adequately warn of those potential risks, and that the lack of sufficient warning was a substantial factor in causing Cornelius's harm. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002, 993…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)

    …Formosa liken this case to Hunter, supra, 37 Cal.App.4th 1282 and Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 (Dumin). There is no fair comparison. The plaintiff in Hunter testified…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Ransom v. Calaveras Asbestos, Ltd. (2009)

    …sophisticated user\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1188-1189 \[bulk supplier defense does not apply to asbestos\].) These contentions were not raised during the trial. No jury instructions were…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2018 · in the opinion

    Trapp v. CertainTEED Corporation (2018)

    …In so doing, appellants are not "expected to prove the scientifically unknown details of carcinogenesis, or trace the unknowable path of a given asbestos fiber." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 976.…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)

    …L.Rev. 1153, 1161.) This characteristic underlies our Supreme Court's conclusion in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) that "\[i\]n an asbestos-related cancer case, the plaintiff need not…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 22, 2008 · in the opinion

    Behshid v. Bondex International, Inc. (2008)

    …a substantial factor in causing Dr. Behshid's mesothelioma. This contention is not persuasive. Causation in asbestos cases In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), the Supreme Court held that the…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Burch v. Certainteed Corporation (2019)

    …g., Bailey v. Central Vermont Ry., Inc. (1943) 319 U.S. 350, 352; Alber v. Owens (1967) 66 Cal.2d 790, 792; Thompson v. Atchison, T.&S.F. Ry. Co. (1950) 96 Cal.App.2d 974…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion

    Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)

    …the reasons set forth below. A. Causation GP contends that plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the "substantial factor" standard of causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Paulus v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …the defendant's asbestos products was, in reasonable medical probability, a substantial factor in causing or contributing to his risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 957-958 \[67…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 10, 2015 · in the opinion

    Green v. CertainTEED Corporation (2015)

    …Step One Turning to step one, California and Texas apply different standards to determine the issue of causation in asbestos litigation. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), sets forth the "substantial…