36 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003 · in the opinion
Ferris v. Gatke Corporation (2003)
…Cal.App.4th 1409, 1415-1416 \[37 Cal.Rptr.2d 902\].) If there has been no exposure, there is no causation." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655, 33 Cal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion
Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)
…v. Superior Court (1995) 9 Cal.4th 559, 571.) Union Carbide's reliance on Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 is similarly unavailing. In Dumin, the plaintiff could not establish…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 2016 · in the opinion
Rondon v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2016)
…is imposed for three types of product defects: manufacturing defects, design defects, and warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\] (Anderson).…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003 · in the opinion
Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)
…sought, or otherwise discovered his illness or injuries, prior to Proposition 51's effective date of June 4, 1986." (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 525, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2015 · in the opinion
Marteney v. Union Carbide Corp. (2015)
…manufacturer's failure to warn rendered the product unsafe to its users.'" (Ibid., quoting Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1993) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1003.) The jury returned special verdicts that appellants were not negligent…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion
Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)
…person standard. It stresses that negligence, even in a failure-to-warn context, requires proof of the standard of care (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994-995, 1001-1004), and…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2012 · in the opinion
Barker v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)
…defects: Manufacturing defects, design defects, and "\warning defects,' i.e., inadequate warnings or failures to warn."\[4\] (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 25, 2021 · in the opinion
Putt v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2021)
…does not equal absolute liability. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994.) Because all Ford offered the jury was a "vague impression that \[the\] other products \[were\] somewhat similar," because Ford…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2010 · in the opinion
Haver v. BNSF Railway Company (2010)
…about' such risk. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003.)" BNSF argued that Lynne could not be found to have a lesser burden of proof against it, a user of allegedly…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 23, 2018 · in the opinion
Williams v. the Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack OF California (2018)
…plain language of section 377.34," since by definition such damages are not "\loss or damage that the decedent sustained or incurred before death.'" (Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion
Petitpas v. Ford Motor Company (2017)
…and warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) "\[A\] product is defective in design either (1) if the product has failed to perform as safely as an ordinary consumer…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2019 · in the opinion
Rickert v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2019)
…1452, and Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 to the extent they impose the "seriously inconvenient" burden on parties moving for a mere stay based on forum non conveniens\].) Moreover…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 30, 2024 · in the opinion
Brooks v. Mission Stucco Company (2024)
…presented to the jury." (Saller, supra, 187 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1231-1232; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 413…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2012 · in the opinion
Shields v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)
…strictly liable for failure to warn of risks arising from other manufacturers' products — the court began with the general rule formulated in its decision in Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 15, 2015 · in the opinion
Soto v. BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. (2015)
…that it was more likely than not that Medina was exposed to asbestos at ASARCO. Plaintiffs argue that Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 \[33 Cal.Rptr.2d 702\] (Dumin)…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2015 · in the opinion
Greenberg v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2015)
…three kinds of defects: manufacturing defects, design defects, and warning defects, that is, inadequate warnings or failures to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Merrill v. Navegar, Inc., supra…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2015 · in the opinion
Sherman v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2015)
…defects, design defects, and warning defects, that is, inadequate warnings or failures to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\]; Merrill v…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2024 · in the opinion
Watts v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2024)
…no evidence of sufficient sustainability to support the claim or defense of the party opposing the motion...." (Howard v. Owens Corning (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 621, 629-630 \[85 Cal.Rptr.2d 386\].) "On appeal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Vanni v. Honeywell International, Inc. (2021)
…reasonable inference and resolving conflicts in support of the judgment. (Howard v. Owens Corning (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 621, 630). In an asbestos-related injury case, causation involves two elements: exposure and substantial factor causation…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · December 1, 2016 · in the opinion
Kesner v. Superior Court and Haver (2016)
…. ."\]; accord, Alcaraz v. Vece (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1149, 1156.) In determining whether a premises owner owes a duty to persons on its property, we apply the Rowland factors. (See, e.g., Thai v. Stang (1989…