No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

10 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 19, 2005 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2005)

    …In some cases, there are no special rules for liability toward contractor's employees, and general negligence rules are applied. (Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (La.Ct.App. 2004) 878 So.2d 631, 639, fn…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 20, 2007 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2007)

    …negligence theory) unless the manufacturer had actual or constructive knowledge of the potential hazard. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003.) Unocal contends the notion of what constitutes a "hazard…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)

    …Formosa liken this case to Hunter, supra, 37 Cal.App.4th 1282 and Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 (Dumin). There is no fair comparison. The plaintiff in Hunter testified…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 30, 2024 · in the opinion

    Brooks v. Mission Stucco Company (2024)

    …presented to the jury." (Saller, supra, 187 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1231-1232; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 413…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 4, 2021 · in the opinion

    Swanson v. The Marley-Wylain Co. (2021)

    …than one proximate cause of an injury" such that multiple "causes frequently operate concurrently so that \[they\] constitute a direct proximate cause of the resulting harm." (Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 225 Mich.App…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Strickland v. Union Carbide Corp. (2013)

    …Zogarts (1975) 14 Cal.3d 104, 110.) Law Governing Proof of Causation in Asbestos Cases Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) sets forth the controlling standard for proving causation in an…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Hernandez v. Amcord, Inc. (2013)

    …factor in causing Mr. Hernandez's mesothelioma to a reasonable degree of medical probability. The trial court cited Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 \[67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 27, 2009 · in the opinion

    Mahoney v. Georgia-Pacific, LLC (2009)

    …the reasons set forth below. A. Causation GP contends that plaintiffs failed to introduce evidence sufficient to satisfy the "substantial factor" standard of causation set forth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Morgan v. JM Manufacturing Co., Inc. (2021)

    …MM's arguments in turn. A. Morgan's Exposure to J-MM Asbestos-cement Pipe Our Supreme Court examined causation in asbestos cases in depth in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 18, 2003 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corp. (2003)

    …to protect themselves against it, and \[¶\] (c) fails to exercise reasonable care to protect them against the danger." Thus, a landowner owes a duty to invitees to exercise reasonable care in maintaining the premises. (§ 343; see […