No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

11 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998

    Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)

    … it remanded for allocation of noneconomic damages between Owens Corning and ACL and otherwise affirmed the judgment for Arena. A supplier of raw asbestos is subject to strict products liability and the consumer expectations test of…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Hellam v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …design." (Bailey v. Safeway, Inc. (2011) 199 Cal.App.4th 206, 214, citing Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 413, 432.…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2002 · in the opinion

    McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc. (2002)

    …1420-1421, 37 Cal. Rptr.2d 902), and Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., supra, 28 Cal.App.4th [\29] at pages 655-656, 33 Cal.Rptr.2d 702, resulted in nonsuits or directed verdicts that…

  4. Court case · California Supreme Court · May 15, 2000 · in the opinion

    Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2000)

    …same\]; Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999) 230 Wis.2d 212, 601 N.W.2d 627, 636 \[same\]; but see Pustejovsky v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (Tex.App.1998) 980 S.W.2d 828, 831-833…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2008 · in the opinion

    Garza v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2008)

    …DISCUSSION A. Personal Jurisdiction\[\\\\] B. Arena v. Owens-Corning In Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation (Arena) (1998) 63 Cal. App.4th 1178, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 580, Division One of this Court upheld a judgment…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 11, 2008 · in the opinion

    Norris v. Crane Company (2008)

    …and reasonably foreseeable manner; or (2) whether the benefits of the challenged design outweigh the risk of danger inherent in the design. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)

    …Formosa liken this case to Hunter, supra, 37 Cal.App.4th 1282 and Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 (Dumin). There is no fair comparison. The plaintiff in Hunter testified…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 30, 2024 · in the opinion

    Brooks v. Mission Stucco Company (2024)

    …presented to the jury." (Saller, supra, 187 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1231-1232; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 413…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 15, 2015 · in the opinion

    Soto v. BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc. (2015)

    …that it was more likely than not that Medina was exposed to asbestos at ASARCO. Plaintiffs argue that Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 \[33 Cal.Rptr.2d 702\] (Dumin)…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 8, 2018 · in the opinion

    Foglia v. Moore Dry Dock Company (2018)

    …Howard v. Owens Corning (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 621, 633 \[\the opinion of any expert witness "is only as good as the facts and reasons on which it is based"' and a fact finder ought…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 26, 2019 · in the opinion

    Harris v. Triple A Machine Shop, Inc. (2019)

    …that a particular exposure or series of exposures was a \legal cause' of his injury, i.e., a substantial factor in bringing about the injury." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 982…