No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

152 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 8

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 11, 1995

    Morton v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995)

    …Morton's consortium award to $30,000, and otherwise affirmed the judgment against Owens-Corning Fiberglas. The consumer expectations test for design defect can apply to asbestos insulation products. Evidence of what the scientific community knew…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 22, 1994

    Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Owens-Corning Fiberglas, holding that the trial court correctly directed a verdict against Dumin on exposure to OCF Kaylo aboard the Pocono because the evidence was insufficient. Even…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's orders staying the Hansens' California asbestos actions against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and others on forum non conveniens grounds, so the plaintiffs lost and were directed to file…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998

    Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)

    … it remanded for allocation of noneconomic damages between Owens Corning and ACL and otherwise affirmed the judgment for Arena. A supplier of raw asbestos is subject to strict products liability and the consumer expectations test of…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 30, 2004

    Cadlo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2004)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Owens-Illinois, upholding the demurrer to the fraud, misrepresentation and concert-of-action claims and the summary judgment on the product claims, against plaintiffs Anthony and Maxlyn Cadlo…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 10, 2023

    Wilgenbusch v. Metalclad Insulation LLC (2023)

    …Owens Corning (Kaylo) and later Fiberboard (Pabco). A jury found Metalclad liable for design defect, failure to warn, and negligent failure to warn. It assigned Metalclad 7 percent of responsibility and 12 percent each to Owens…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010

    Collins v. Plant Insulation Company (2010)

    …the FTCA's discretionary function exception is an immunity from suit, not a determination that the government owes no duty or is not at fault, so fault may be apportioned to the Navy under Proposition 51…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 17, 1995 · in the opinion

    Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995)

    …operation to Owens-Corning Fiberglass in April 1958. Owens-Corning Fiberglass continued to make and sell Kaylo pipe covering and block insulation after April 1958. The Kaylo products were made for Owens-Corning Fiberglass by Fibreboard…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012

    Nolen v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2012)

    …water treatment chemicals Pacific State Steel Fremont or Hayward 1976-1979; sales engineer/sales representative for water treatment chemicals Owens-Corning Fiberglass Santa Clara 1976-1979; sales engineer/sales representative for water treatment chemicals Chevron Richmond…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 16, 2007 · in the opinion

    Garcia v. Duro Dyne Corporation (2007)

    …all damages, economic and noneconomic. Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1197-1198 (Arena) held that Proposition 51 applies to strict liability asbestos cases under certain circumstances. Wilson v. John Crane…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2009)

    …PLC (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1224 \[53 Cal.Rptr.2d 642\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1187 \[74 Cal.Rptr.2d 580\] \[raw asbestos fibers are not altered…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion

    Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)

    Such evidence is simply not "of sufficient weight to support a reasonable inference of causation." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 656; see also McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., supra…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003 · in the opinion

    Ferris v. Gatke Corporation (2003)

    …Cal.App.4th 1409, 1415-1416 \[37 Cal.Rptr.2d 902\].) If there has been no exposure, there is no causation." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655, 33 Cal…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 22, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …supra, 205 Cal.App.4th at p. 88; Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1668), and we have no cause to address them here. While considerations about the current leadership…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 26, 2011 · in the opinion

    Galicinao v. McMASTER Carr Supply Company (2011)

    …the plaintiff proves the defendant's product was at his or her work site. \[Citation.\]" (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655 (Dumin).) Our Supreme Court in Rutherford specifically declined…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2011 · in the opinion

    Woodard v. Crane Co. (2011)

    …design defects, and failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) In his complaint, Woodard alleged that Crane's valves were defective based on theories of defective design and…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Izell v. Union Carbide Corporation (2014)

    …supra, 205 Cal.App.4th at p. 88; Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1668), and we have no cause to address them here. While considerations about the current leadership…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    City of Pasadena v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2017)

    …when addressing statutes of limitations applicable to latent diseases such as mesothelioma. In Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520 (Buttram), our Supreme Court noted that "as a general proposition it is…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …v. Superior Court (1995) 9 Cal.4th 559, 571.) Union Carbide's reliance on Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 is similarly unavailing. In Dumin, the plaintiff could not establish…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Leonard v. John Crane, Inc. (2012)

    …decades can pass between the first asbestos exposure and development of cancerous mesothelioma tumors. (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520 \[66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438, 941 P.2d 71\] (Buttram).)\[5…