No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

69 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 4

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 11, 1995

    Morton v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995)

    …Morton's consortium award to $30,000, and otherwise affirmed the judgment against Owens-Corning Fiberglas. The consumer expectations test for design defect can apply to asbestos insulation products. Evidence of what the scientific community knew…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 22, 1994

    Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Owens-Corning Fiberglas, holding that the trial court correctly directed a verdict against Dumin on exposure to OCF Kaylo aboard the Pocono because the evidence was insufficient. Even…

  3. Court case · California Supreme Court · August 18, 1997

    Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997)

    …holding the accrual test wrong and remanding; this favors defendant Owens-Corning. For deciding whether Proposition 51 can be applied prospectively, a cause of action for a latent disease like mesothelioma accrues when the plaintiff is…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998

    Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)

    … it remanded for allocation of noneconomic damages between Owens Corning and ACL and otherwise affirmed the judgment for Arena. A supplier of raw asbestos is subject to strict products liability and the consumer expectations test of…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 30, 2004

    Cadlo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2004)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Owens-Illinois, upholding the demurrer to the fraud, misrepresentation and concert-of-action claims and the summary judgment on the product claims, against plaintiffs Anthony and Maxlyn Cadlo…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1999 · in the opinion

    Howard v. Owens Corning (1999)

    …1\] Howard's original personal injury complaint sued respondent Owens Corning under the company's former name of Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation. Throughout this litigation, the parties have referred to Owens Corning under its new name…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 10, 2023

    Wilgenbusch v. Metalclad Insulation LLC (2023)

    …Owens Corning (Kaylo) and later Fiberboard (Pabco). A jury found Metalclad liable for design defect, failure to warn, and negligent failure to warn. It assigned Metalclad 7 percent of responsibility and 12 percent each to Owens…

  8. Court case · California Supreme Court · August 28, 1997 · in the opinion

    Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997)

    …Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co., supra, 31 Cal. App.4th at pp. 1420-1421; Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal. App.4th 650, 655-657 \[33 Cal. Rptr.2d 702\]; Viglioto, supra, 643…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 17, 1995 · in the opinion

    Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995)

    …operation to Owens-Corning Fiberglass in April 1958. Owens-Corning Fiberglass continued to make and sell Kaylo pipe covering and block insulation after April 1958. The Kaylo products were made for Owens-Corning Fiberglass by Fibreboard…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012

    Nolen v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2012)

    …water treatment chemicals Pacific State Steel Fremont or Hayward 1976-1979; sales engineer/sales representative for water treatment chemicals Owens-Corning Fiberglass Santa Clara 1976-1979; sales engineer/sales representative for water treatment chemicals Chevron Richmond…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2009)

    …PLC (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1224 \[53 Cal.Rptr.2d 642\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1187 \[74 Cal.Rptr.2d 580\] \[raw asbestos fibers are not altered…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion

    Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)

    Such evidence is simply not "of sufficient weight to support a reasonable inference of causation." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 656; see also McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., supra…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 2, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rollin v. Foster Wheeler, LLC (2012)

    …and can be held strictly liable for injuries caused by their failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1003.) The sophisticated user defense relieves a manufacturer from its usual…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 25, 2011 · in the opinion

    Woodard v. Crane Co. (2011)

    …design defects, and failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) In his complaint, Woodard alleged that Crane's valves were defective based on theories of defective design and…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …v. Superior Court (1995) 9 Cal.4th 559, 571.) Union Carbide's reliance on Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 is similarly unavailing. In Dumin, the plaintiff could not establish…

  16. Court case · California Supreme Court · January 12, 2012 · in the opinion

    O'neil v. Crane Co. (2012)

    …General Principles (8) "Generally speaking, manufacturers have a duty to warn consumers about the hazards inherent in their products. (Anderson \[v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\], supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 1003.) The requirement's purpose…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 27, 2010 · in the opinion

    Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2010)

    …Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 472 (Sparks).) Products liability may be premised upon a theory of design defect, manufacturing defect, or failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. …

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    Sandoval v. American Appliance Manufacturing Corp. (2017)

    …We disagree. The purpose of punitive damages is "to punish wrongdoing and deter future misconduct by either the defendant or other potential wrongdoers." (Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 1645, 1658…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 27, 2019 · in the opinion

    Schildknegt v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)

    …1104-1105 \[same\]; Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 654-657 \[affirming nonsuit in favor of manufacturer because plaintiff offered insufficient evidence he encountered manufacturer's specific asbestos-containing product…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 31, 1995 · in the opinion

    Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co. (1995)

    …2d 691, 697-698\] \[collecting cases\].) As we ourselves have earlier intimated, the extension of Summers to asbestos [\1418] cases is troublesome. (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., supra, 28 Cal. App.4th at p. 657…