No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

17 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's orders staying the Hansens' California asbestos actions against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and others on forum non conveniens grounds, so the plaintiffs lost and were directed to file…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    …the forum non conveniens motion can be granted. In that regard, Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen) is instructive. Hansen was an asbestos case with 200 named defendants. (Id…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2002 · in the opinion

    McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc. (2002)

    …1420-1421, 37 Cal. Rptr.2d 902), and Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., supra, 28 Cal.App.4th [\29] at pages 655-656, 33 Cal.Rptr.2d 702, resulted in nonsuits or directed verdicts that…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)

    …person standard. It stresses that negligence, even in a failure-to-warn context, requires proof of the standard of care (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994-995, 1001-1004), and…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 27, 2019 · in the opinion

    Schildknegt v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)

    …1104-1105 \[same\]; Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 654-657 \[affirming nonsuit in favor of manufacturer because plaintiff offered insufficient evidence he encountered manufacturer's specific asbestos-containing product…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    Hackett v. John Crane, Inc. (2002)

    …Cal.App.4th 847, 852-859, 97 Cal. Rptr.2d 240 (Wilson); Arena v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal. App.4th 1178, 1197, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 580.) Under Proposition 51, Crane is jointly…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Stewart v. Union Carbide Corporation (2010)

    …Ltd. (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 651; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1188.) Union Carbide does not address these cases with any specificity, but only refers to plaintiffs' reliance…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 24, 2016 · in the opinion

    The Marley-Wylain Co. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2016)

    …and distributors to strict products liability. (O'Neil v. Crane Co. (2012) 53 Cal.4th 335, 347; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995.) Michigan does not. (Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. …

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 4, 2021 · in the opinion

    Swanson v. The Marley-Wylain Co. (2021)

    …than one proximate cause of an injury" such that multiple "causes frequently operate concurrently so that \[they\] constitute a direct proximate cause of the resulting harm." (Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 225 Mich.App…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 4, 2009 · in the opinion

    Ransom v. Calaveras Asbestos, Ltd. (2009)

    …sophisticated user\]; Arena v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 1178, 1188-1189 \[bulk supplier defense does not apply to asbestos\].) These contentions were not raised during the trial. No jury instructions were…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 17, 2017 · in the opinion

    Phillips v. Honeywell International Inc. (2017)

    …L.Rev. 1153, 1161.) This characteristic underlies our Supreme Court's conclusion in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) that "\[i\]n an asbestos-related cancer case, the plaintiff need not…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 6, 2013 · in the opinion

    Klinger v. Alderete (2013)

    …Unocal Corp. (2005) 37 Cal.4th 659, 682; Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 962.) Given these facts and the legal authority at the time, we find that Klinger did not establish…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    Paulus v. Crane Co. (2014)

    …the defendant's asbestos products was, in reasonable medical probability, a substantial factor in causing or contributing to his risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 957-958 \[67…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 23, 1994 · in the opinion

    Smith v. ACandS, Inc. (1994)

    …another contractor working on the premises. On the first point, [\95] Smith's argument against retroactivity has recently been rejected by the Fifth District. (Owens v. Giannetta-Heinrich Construction Co. (1994) 23 Cal. App.4th 1662 \…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 13, 2012 · in the opinion

    Casey v. Perini Corporation (2012)

    …to Present Sufficient Evidence to Raise a Triable Issue of Fact Regarding Causation A threshold issue in asbestos litigation is exposure to the relevant asbestos product. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 25, 2014 · in the opinion

    Lovelace v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2014)

    …tortfeasors, we "resolve all conflicts in the evidence in favor of respondent, and indulge all legitimate and reasonable inferences in support of the judgment." (Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 471…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 19, 2018 · in the opinion

    Hubbard v. California Water Service Company (2018)

    …explained in a footnote that it was using the term "landowner" to refer "to either an owner or a possessor of land that owes some kind of duty of care to keep the premises safe." (Kinsman…