6 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion
Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)
Such evidence is simply not "of sufficient weight to support a reasonable inference of causation." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 656; see also McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., supra…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion
Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)
…v. Superior Court (1995) 9 Cal.4th 559, 571.) Union Carbide's reliance on Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 is similarly unavailing. In Dumin, the plaintiff could not establish…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2000 · in the opinion
Wilson v. John Crane, Inc. (2000)
…1986, section 1431.2 is the "heart" of Proposition 51, formally but less widely known as the Fair Responsibility Act of 1986. (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 528, fn. 3…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Shiffer v. CBS Corporation (2015)
…Howard v. Owens Corning (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 621, 633 \[85 Cal.Rptr.2d 386\] \["the opinion of any expert witness \is only as good as the facts and reasons on which it is based…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 23, 1994 · in the opinion
Smith v. ACandS, Inc. (1994)
…another contractor working on the premises. On the first point, [\95] Smith's argument against retroactivity has recently been rejected by the Fifth District. (Owens v. Giannetta-Heinrich Construction Co. (1994) 23 Cal. App.4th 1662 \…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2009 · in the opinion
Short v. Sequoia Ventures, Inc. (2009)
…and accepted" doctrine, under which a builder or designer of a real property improvement owes no duty to a third party injured by a patent defect after the owner accepts the completed improvement. (See Jones v…