No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Haver v. BNSF Railway Company (2010)

    …about' such risk. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003.)" BNSF argued that Lynne could not be found to have a lesser burden of proof against it, a user of allegedly…

  2. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 1, 2016 · in the opinion

    Kesner v. Superior Court and Haver (2016)

    …. ."\]; accord, Alcaraz v. Vece (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1149, 1156.) In determining whether a premises owner owes a duty to persons on its property, we apply the Rowland factors. (See, e.g., Thai v. Stang (1989…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Hahn v. New York Air Brake LLC (2022)

    …cause of action against a manufacturer for asbestos-related latent injuries, a plaintiff must "establish some threshold exposure to the defendant's defective asbestos-containing products." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2014

    Haver v. BNSF Railway Co. (2014)

    …Ford Motor Co., a premises owner owes no duty of care to family members of workers who are secondarily exposed to asbestos off the premises, whether the worker was employed by the owner or by a…