No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

29 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 11, 1995

    Morton v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995)

    …Morton's consortium award to $30,000, and otherwise affirmed the judgment against Owens-Corning Fiberglas. The consumer expectations test for design defect can apply to asbestos insulation products. Evidence of what the scientific community knew…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998

    Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)

    … it remanded for allocation of noneconomic damages between Owens Corning and ACL and otherwise affirmed the judgment for Arena. A supplier of raw asbestos is subject to strict products liability and the consumer expectations test of…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2010

    Collins v. Plant Insulation Company (2010)

    …the FTCA's discretionary function exception is an immunity from suit, not a determination that the government owes no duty or is not at fault, so fault may be apportioned to the Navy under Proposition 51…

  4. Court case · California Supreme Court · August 28, 1997 · in the opinion

    Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997)

    …Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co., supra, 31 Cal. App.4th at pp. 1420-1421; Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal. App.4th 650, 655-657 \[33 Cal. Rptr.2d 702\]; Viglioto, supra, 643…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 17, 1995 · in the opinion

    Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995)

    …operation to Owens-Corning Fiberglass in April 1958. Owens-Corning Fiberglass continued to make and sell Kaylo pipe covering and block insulation after April 1958. The Kaylo products were made for Owens-Corning Fiberglass by Fibreboard…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003 · in the opinion

    Ferris v. Gatke Corporation (2003)

    …Cal.App.4th 1409, 1415-1416 \[37 Cal.Rptr.2d 902\].) If there has been no exposure, there is no causation." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655, 33 Cal…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 14, 2003 · in the opinion

    Cossman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2003)

    …sought, or otherwise discovered his illness or injuries, prior to Proposition 51's effective date of June 4, 1986." (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520, 525, 66 Cal.Rptr.2d 438…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 28, 2010 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)

    …trigger strict liability for that product's defect. As already stressed, liability for product defects "is not absolute." (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., supra, 53 Cal.3d at p. 994.) The imposition of liability must…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 27, 2019 · in the opinion

    Schildknegt v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2019)

    …1104-1105 \[same\]; Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 654-657 \[affirming nonsuit in favor of manufacturer because plaintiff offered insufficient evidence he encountered manufacturer's specific asbestos-containing product…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · January 31, 1995 · in the opinion

    Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co. (1995)

    …2d 691, 697-698\] \[collecting cases\].) As we ourselves have earlier intimated, the extension of Summers to asbestos [\1418] cases is troublesome. (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., supra, 28 Cal. App.4th at p. 657…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    Hackett v. John Crane, Inc. (2002)

    …Cal.App.4th 847, 852-859, 97 Cal. Rptr.2d 240 (Wilson); Arena v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998) 63 Cal. App.4th 1178, 1197, 74 Cal.Rptr.2d 580.) Under Proposition 51, Crane is jointly…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Oxford v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2009)

    …dangerous to place the product in the hands of a user without a suitable warning or if no warning is given. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1000 \[281 Cal.Rptr…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 23, 2010 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. Certainteed Corporation (2010)

    …there is no causation. (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655 (Dumin).) "Plaintiffs may prove causation in an asbestos case by demonstrating that the plaintiff's or decedent's exposure…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2007 · in the opinion

    Rosen v. Regents of University of California (2007)

    …care. In such a case, liability turns on what a reasonably prudent distributor would have known and warned about. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003 (Anderson); Valentine v. Baxter…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion

    Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)

    …other factors. But the same court also cited with approval the Hansen v. Owens\[-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\] (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753, deferring to that court's opinion in the context of asbestos litigation. The…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 8, 2018 · in the opinion

    Foglia v. Moore Dry Dock Company (2018)

    …Howard v. Owens Corning (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 621, 633 \[\the opinion of any expert witness "is only as good as the facts and reasons on which it is based"' and a fact finder ought…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2009 · in the opinion

    Silvestro v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2009)

    …A Lite 0% CertainTeed Corp. 5% Pipe Covering/Block Insulation Armstrong, Inc. 0% Owens-Illinois 0% Pittsburg Corning 0% Johns Manville 20% JT Thorpe and Son, Inc. 0% Metalclad Insulation Corp. 0% Refractiories/Castables AP Green…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Strickland v. Union Carbide Corp. (2013)

    …Zogarts (1975) 14 Cal.3d 104, 110.) Law Governing Proof of Causation in Asbestos Cases Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford) sets forth the controlling standard for proving causation in an…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 10, 2006 · in the opinion

    Boyle v. Certainteed Corporation (2006)

    …and then filed this appeal. II. DISCUSSION A. Introduction There are several sources of authority for local judicial rulemaking. (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953, 966-967.) Those sources of authority include…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 26, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Honeywell Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …ago. See, e.g., Brodkin Report at 64. Defendant first cites to the California Supreme Court's opinion in Rutherford v. Owens Illinois, Inc., regarding the proof of causation required in asbestos-related cases. 16 Cal…