No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 12, 1999

    Wallic v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1999)

    The court granted plaintiff Sondra Wallic's motion and awarded her $3,433.57 in fees and costs against Pittsburgh Corning for the improper removal. It also awarded Rule 11 fees and costs against attorney Robert…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · February 12, 1987

    Rice v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (1987)

    Ruby Rice sued eighteen companies on behalf of the estate and heirs of her late husband, Norman E. Rice, who developed mesothelioma and died. She alleged he was exposed to asbestos products made or sold by the defendants and that they failed to warn…

  3. Court case · Colorado Supreme Court · February 16, 1993 · in the opinion

    Fibreboard Corp. v. Fenton (1993)

    …or knowable in light of the generally recognized and prevailing scientific and technical knowledge available at the time of manufacture and distribution. See Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 53 Cal.3d 987, 281 Cal.Rptr…

  4. Court case · Colorado Court of Appeals · September 12, 1991

    Fenton v. Fibreboard Corp. (1991)

    The Colorado Court of Appeals affirmed the $190,000 jury verdict for the plaintiff widow against Fibreboard and Owens-Illinois and the partial set-off ruling, but reversed the costs award and remanded for findings on…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Mestas v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)

    …A trial is the appropriate means to determine what obligations, if any, each Defendant owes to Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs have not shown that they cannot obtain complete relief from any Defendant without the absent parties. Second…