9 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 6, 1995
Harris v. AC & S, Inc. (1995)
The court granted summary judgment to Pittsburgh Corning, Owens-Corning, Anchor Packing and Garlock, and in part to Georgia-Pacific (for Bestwall). It denied it to John Crane, to Georgia-Pacific on its joint compound, and…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · July 20, 2001 · in the opinion
Black v. ACandS, Inc. (2001)
…In Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Cobb, 714 N.E.2d 295, 303 (Ind.Ct. App.1999) we found the trial court erred in denying Owens Corning's motion for summary judgment when Cobb had offered…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · July 8, 1988 · in the opinion
Knox v. AC & S, Inc. (1988)
…Co., 476 N.E.2d 84, 85 (Ind.1985) and the decision in Walters v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 781 F.2d 570 (7th Cir. 1986), finding that Indiana's discovery rule applies in asbestos cases…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · September 14, 2001 · in the opinion
Parks v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)
…to create a genuine issue of material fact concerning product identification. Relying on Harris v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 102 F.3d 1429 (7th Cir.1996), the trial court found that the Parkses had failed to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · September 30, 2015 · in the opinion
Hedden v. CBS Corporation (2015)
…later diagnosis of a distinct malignant asbestos-related condition. The diagnosis of a malignant asbestos-related condition creates a new cause of action." Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 601 N.W.2d 627, 630 (Wis…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · October 18, 2001 · in the opinion
Jurich v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)
…whom an injured plaintiff otherwise could have sought recovery, his or her tort remedy is far from complete. This fact is highlighted by our supreme court's recent decision in Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. Cobb…
-
Court case · Indiana Supreme Court · June 28, 2005
Psi Energy, Inc. v. Roberts (2005)
…absent negligent selection, and a landowner ordinarily owes no liability to a contractor's employees for a condition the contractor was hired to address when the landowner has no superior knowledge. A general verdict stands if…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · September 28, 2016 · in the opinion
Myers v. Bremen Casting, Inc. (2016)
…a principal owes no duty of care to an employee of an independent contractor if (1) there is no allegation the principal negligently selected its independent contractors,\[4\] and (2) the facts establish the employee was…
-
Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · January 28, 2004 · in the opinion
Psi Energy, Inc. v. Roberts (2004)
…N.E.2d 637, 639 (Ind.1991) ("A landowner owes the highest duty to an invitee: a duty to exercise reasonable care for his protection while he is on the landowner's premises."), reh'g denied…