No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

74 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 4

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 28, 1996

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett (1996)

    …liability findings and compensatory awards for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois and Porter Hayden, but reversed the $1.5 million punitive damages award against Owens-Corning in the Scruggs case. A bystander's proof…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 31, 1996

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Baltimore City (1996)

    The Court of Special Appeals reversed the $2,600,000 punitive damages award against Owens-Corning for lack of proof of actual knowledge, affirmed the compensatory award for the City of Baltimore, and rejected the juror…

  3. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 7, 1992

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Armstrong (1992)

    The Court of Appeals of Maryland affirmed the compensatory verdicts for workers Armstrong and Wood against Owens-Illinois, but reversed the punitive damages awards and remanded for new trials limited to punitive damages. A trial judge…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 25, 1999 · in the opinion

    Owens Corning v. Walatka (1999)

    …on behalf of Russell against \[Pittsburgh Corning Corporation\]. Id. at 355, 667 A.2d 116. In applying the proximity, frequency, and regularity test according to the standards utilized in Balbos, Godwin, and Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 1999 · in the opinion

    Owens Corning v. Bauman (1999)

    …Owens Corning now asks us to reject the onset-of-disease standard of Grimshaw, thereby reversing that decision, and to adopt the manifestation of physical impairment/diagnosis standard\[3\] of Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · May 15, 1998 · in the opinion

    Porter Hayden v. Bullinger (1998)

    …liable, the releasee is not considered a joint tort-feasor, and section 3-1404 does not apply to reduce the plaintiff's claim against the nonsettling joint tort-feasor. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett…

  7. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 3, 1997

    Anchor Packing Co. v. Grimshaw (1997)

    …reversed the judgment against Hopeman Brothers. It otherwise affirmed the judgments for the plaintiffs against Anchor and Owens-Corning. The Maryland cap on noneconomic damages applies to asbestos wrongful death claims arising after October 1, 1994…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 26, 2012

    Brannan v. Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust (2012)

    The personal representatives of four deceased men (Brannan, McFadden, Nardone and Jakubowski) had each won asbestos verdicts in Baltimore City between 1996 and 2001. All four died of mesothelioma. Three had been steelworkers at Bethlehem Steel…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002

    Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)

    James Scribner, a Navy veteran who later worked for a power company, developed mesothelioma and died in November 1995. He had sued, and his widow and children continued the case, against John Crane, Garlock and others. Scribner testified that in the…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 30, 1999

    Porter Hayden Company v. Wyche (1999)

    George Wyche, Jr., a longtime worker at Bethlehem Steel's Sparrows Point plant, and his wife Joan sued several companies, including Porter Hayden Company, claiming his asbestosis and lung cancer resulted from workplace exposure to asbestos products.…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 29, 1998 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Owens-Illinois (1998)

    …percent of the cases where no asbestos exposure is involved, according to one of appellant's own medical experts. The credibility of the witnesses was for the jury to determine. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett…

  12. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 18, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Godwin (1995)

    …Talc Co., 949 F.2d 167, 171 (5th Cir.1991); Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir.1986); Zenson v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 836 F. Supp. 302, 304 (E…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 10, 1992 · in the opinion

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1992)

    …the plaintiff would have heeded a warning. Raney v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 897 F.2d 94, 95-96 (2d Cir.1990) (applying New York law); Skonberg v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 215 Ill. App.3d 735…

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 29, 1990 · in the opinion

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1990)

    …1930 to 1971, and distributed under its own label Owens-Corning Fiberglass Hylo block and pipe covering from 1960 to 1972. Eagle-Picher is a defendant in both the Balbos and Knuckles case. Owens-Illinois, Inc…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 26, 2005 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Cook (2005)

    …Me.1980) Tribble v. Gregory, 288 So.2d 13, 16 (Miss. 1974); Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 657 N.E.2d 1301, 1301 (N.Y. 1995); Anderson v. Lilly & Co., 588 N.E.2d 66…

  16. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 1, 2005 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Hunter (2005)

    …800 A.2d 722 (2002) (applying Balbos to an asbestos [\162] bystander); Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 526-30, 682 A.2d 1143 (1996) (same). Owens-Illinois's argument, more specifically stated…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 26, 2005 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Cook (2005)

    …Me.1980) Tribble v. Gregory, 288 So.2d 13, 16 (Miss. 1974); Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 657 N.E.2d 1301, 1301 (N.Y. 1995); Anderson v. Lilly & Co., 588 N.E.2d 66…

  18. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 30, 2002 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois v. Gianotti (2002)

    …has not been, and could not have been, reasonably discovered prior to the marriage. In the case of Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 86 N.Y.2d 449, 634 N.Y.S.2d 18, 657 N…

  19. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 8, 2013 · in the opinion

    Georgia Pacific v. Farrar (2013)

    …should have been aware, of the danger to household members at the time. See Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 965 F.2d 844 (10th Cir.1992) (applying Oklahoma law); Martin v. Cincinnati Gas and Electric…

  20. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)

    …is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…