No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

15 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 28, 1996

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett (1996)

    …liability findings and compensatory awards for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois and Porter Hayden, but reversed the $1.5 million punitive damages award against Owens-Corning in the Scruggs case. A bystander's proof…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 26, 2005 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Cook (2005)

    …Me.1980) Tribble v. Gregory, 288 So.2d 13, 16 (Miss. 1974); Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 657 N.E.2d 1301, 1301 (N.Y. 1995); Anderson v. Lilly & Co., 588 N.E.2d 66…

  3. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 8, 2013 · in the opinion

    Georgia Pacific v. Farrar (2013)

    …should have been aware, of the danger to household members at the time. See Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, 965 F.2d 844 (10th Cir.1992) (applying Oklahoma law); Martin v. Cincinnati Gas and Electric…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 10, 2018 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)

    …is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2018 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2018)

    …is what the Court of Appeals has "termed a \bystander,' in that he did not work directly with the asbestos products but was in the vicinity of where such products were used." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 7, 1998 · in the opinion

    ACandS v. Abate (1998)

    …who suffered from asbestosis which, apparently, was manifested only by pleural plaques. See also Barry v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 282 Ill.App.3d 199, 217 Ill.Dec. 823, 668 N.E.2d 8 (1996) (affirming…

  7. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · September 26, 2012 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific v. Farrar (2012)

    …work clothes. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Granski against, inter alia, Owens-Corning, f/k/a Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation ("OC"), who manufactured a hazardous asbestos-containing insulation product called Kaylo. Id. at…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 3, 2005 · in the opinion

    Benjamin v. Union Carbide Corporation (2005)

    …Wilson v. John Crane, Inc., 385 Md. 185, \_\_\_ (2005)(quoting Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 506-507 n.2 (1996)). \[5\] The court granted the motion after a hearing held on April…

  9. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Pransky (2002)

    …Inc., 283 Md. 296, 328, 389 A.2d 887, 906 (1978) (same); Owens-Corning v. Walatka, 125 Md.App. 313, 342, 725 A.2d 579, 593 (1999) (same). Because Lisa did not handle the joint compound…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 16, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2014)

    …evidence of exposure to the defendant's asbestos. See Reiter v. Pneumo Abex, LLC, 8 A.3d 725, 729 (Md. 2010); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, 602 A.2d 1182, 1184 (Md. 1992). \[33\] This evidence…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 24, 2015

    Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2015)

    …A.W. Chesterton back to state court. The court rejected Union Carbide's argument that its cross-claim against Owens-Illinois created federal jurisdiction. It still kept the state-law claims under supplemental jurisdiction. Discovery was…

  12. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 8, 1998 · in the opinion

    Ford Motor v. Wood (1998)

    In Owens-Illinois v. Armstrong, 326 Md. 107, 604 A.2d 47, cert. denied, 506 U.S. 871, 113 S.Ct. 204, 121 L.Ed.2d 145 (1992) (hereinafter Armstrong II), the Court of Appeals first…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Coates (2018)

    …a negligent failure to warn action." May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp., 446 Md. 1, 25 n.22 (2015) (citation omitted). In Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia, supra, the Court noted that Professors Henderson and Twerski …

  14. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 3, 2020 · in the opinion

    Rossello v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2020)

    …Fischer, Insurance Coverage for Mass Exposure Tort Claims: The Debate Over the Appropriate Trigger Rule, 45 Drake L. Rev. 625, 652 (1997)); see Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co., 650 A.2d 974, 979 (N…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · July 3, 2019 · in the opinion

    Wallace & Gale Asbestos Settlement Trust v. Busch (2019)

    …permissible to inform a jury that a co-defendant to the asbestos lawsuit had been dismissed when a remaining defendant "opens the door" by introducing evidence relating to the earlier presence of that now-dismissed party…