6 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · Maryland Appellate Court · February 8, 2024 · in the opinion
Basil-Flippen v. General Electric Company (2024)
…dust." Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md. 500, 506 (1996); see also id. at 506 n.2 (describing the medical field's study of mesothelioma and conclusions about its relation to asbestos); Owens-Illinois…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 30, 2013 · in the opinion
Burns v. Bechtel Corp. (2013)
…v. Raymark Indus., Inc., 905 F.2d 793 (4th Cir.1990) (interpreting Virginia's statute of repose); Buttz v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 557 N.W.2d 90 (Iowa 1996); Olsen v. Oklahoma Gas & Elec. Co.…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion
John Crane, Inc. v. Puller (2006)
…is made." Thus, we are not \[privileged\] to dissect the evidence and weigh the credibility of its messengers, which is what Crane has asked us to do. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 27, 2017 · in the opinion
Hiett v. Ac&r Insulation Co., Inc. (2017)
…the Court of Appeals referenced this Court's decision in Adams v. Owens-Illinois, stating that our decision applied "the same policy of avoiding expansive new duties to hold that an employer owed no duty to…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · November 2, 2018 · in the opinion
Estate of Schatz v. John Crane, Inc. (2018)
…Id. Rather than find that the duty to warn extended by way of an intermediary, the Court instead required a relationship between the plaintiff and defendant. Cf. Adams v. Owens-Illinois, 119 Md. App. 395, 411…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 4, 2004
Wajer v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (2004)
…asbestos insulation and products nearby. The circuit court granted summary judgment to BGE, reasoning that a landowner owes no duty to an independent contractor's employees. The Court of Special Appeals affirmed. It held that several…