13 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · June 15, 1998
Consorti v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (In Re Joint Eastern and Southern Dist. Asbestos, 1998)
The court granted Owens Corning's motion for a new trial unless Consorti accepts a reduced pain and suffering award of $5 million (a $7 million remittitur), and denied Owens Corning's request to cut the…
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · October 24, 1995
Consorti v. Owens Corning (1995)
…York Court of Appeals answered the Second Circuit's certified question in the negative, so Frances Consorti had no loss of consortium claim against Owens-Corning, which prevailed on that question. In toxic substance exposure cases…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · January 21, 1994
Tabolt v. Flintkote Co. (In re New York Asbestos Litigation, 1994)
Four men with pleural mesothelioma, or their spouses, sued several asbestos companies in federal court in New York. They were Vincent Tabolt, John Consorti, Alfred Luchnick and Peter Pulizzi. Tabolt worked at a farm cooperative and was said to have…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 5, 2015 · in the opinion
Ricci v. Crane Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2015)
Grace & Co.-Conn), 216 AD2d 79 \[1st Dept. 1995\]). Issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 11, 2011 · in the opinion
Tedrick v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Matter of Nyc Asbestos Litig., 2011)
…the "first exposure" rule originating with Schmidt v Merchants Despatch Transp. Co. (270 NY 287 \[1936\]) and its progeny (e.g. Consorti v Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 86 NY2d 449 \[1995\]; Blanco v American Tel. & Tel…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2012 · in the opinion
Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. Ronald Dummitt v. AW Chesterton (2012)
…In re New York Asbestos Litigation (Marshall), supra at 256 (citing Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation (Ronsini), supra; Zalinka v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp, 221 AD2d 830 \[3rd Dept 1995\]; Bigelow v. Acands, Inc…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 17, 2022 · in the opinion
Aylward v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2022)
…FMC CORPORATION, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GOULD PUMPS LLC, ITT LLC., KEELER-DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, NAVISTAR, INC., A/K/A INTERNATIONAL, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., PFIZER, INC. (PFIZER), RILEY POWER INC, THE FAIRBANKS COMPANY, U.S. RUBBER…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · June 20, 2017 · in the opinion
Altman v. Ford Motor Co. (In re New York City Asbetos Litigation, 2017)
…Hayes, Lipe Automation Corp., Lucas Variety Automotive Holdings Co., Mack Trucks, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Navistar, Inc., Owens Illinois, Inc., Pneumo Abex Corp., Riley Power, Inc., Todd Shipyards Corp., Volvo Trucks North America, Inc., and…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 18, 2019
Lewis v. QCP (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…raises credibility issues that cannot be resolved on papers. Causation; Product Identification Worksites: Restaurants and pizzerias with Bakers Pride pizza ovens, New York plumber Restaurants and pizzerias with Bakers Pride pizza ovens New York 1955-1965
-
Court case · New York Court of Appeals · June 28, 2016 · in the opinion
Mtr OF Nyc Asbestos Litig. (2016)
…to enable the manufacturer's product to function as intended" (majority op at 778). I believe this test opens too broad an avenue of potential liability and that, in line with our precedent in this area…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of New York · August 1, 2012 · in the opinion
Tycz v. Asbeka Industries OF New York, Inc. (2012)
…business with one another. It further notes that although Niagara may have been the exclusive supplier of Johns Manville products, Blodgett did not engage local entities to supply ovens to customers. Moreover, documents relied on by…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · August 9, 2021 · in the opinion
Paroni EX rel. Estate OF Paroni v. General Electric UK Holdings Ltd. (2021)
…repeated references to the fact that GEUKH "has \no employees, no revenues,'" that GE "owns 100% of \[GEUKH's\] share capital," and that GE and GEUKH are "one corporate entity." Pl. Opp'n at 5. Accordingly…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 25, 2021 · in the opinion
Nelson v. 3M Co. (2021)
…in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state." Here, defendant contends that this court does not have general jurisdiction over…