4 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 1, 2013 · in the opinion
Burkhart v. HJ Heinz Co. (2013)
…No. 7 with her memorandum in opposition to summary judgment contains certain pages from a "Supplemental Response to Plaintiffs' Master Discovery Requests" by Owens Corning Fiberglas Corporation in a Summit County Common Pleas Court case, In…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · January 27, 2011 · in the opinion
Fisher v. Alliance Machine Co. (2011)
…employed there. Accordingly, we disagree that it qualifies as a written admission. {¶ 42} Fisher's estate also attached several invoices from Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, purporting to show that Clark distributed asbestos products, specifically, Kaylo pipe…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 14, 2006
Rettig v. Gen. Motors Corp. (2006)
…his employer knew of asbestos dangers. The Wellman rule, under which a premises owner owes no duty to an independent contractor's employees doing inherently dangerous work, applies only if the contractor or its employee knew…
-
Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · January 24, 2018 · in the opinion
Schwartz v. Honeywell Internatl., Inc. (2018)
…R.C. 2307.96(B), the statute provides no definition for the term "substantial factor." This lack of clarity opens the door to inconsistent application of R.C. 2307.96 and gave rise to this appeal. {¶…