No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 16, 2002 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2002)

    …that \[her\] contact with it was of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it." Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614…

  2. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 17, 2024 · in the opinion

    Constantine v. Lenox Instrument Co., Inc. (2024)

    …exposure. See Andaloro v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc., 799 A.2d 71, 86 (Pa. Super. 2002) (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning, 729 A.2d 614, 622-23 (Pa. Super. 1999)); Fisher v. J.A. Sexauer, 53…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 18, 2007

    Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Company (2007)

    …and sewer pipe in Pittsburgh. He later worked at the Anchor Hocking glass plant, where he was exposed to asbestos cement used to repair glass-annealing ovens (lehrs), to pipe covering, and to transite mill board…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · April 7, 2011

    Wagers v. Sgl Carbon, LLC (2011)

    …a premises owner owes an independent contractor's employees a general duty to warn of hidden dangers, but no breach occurs where the contractor already knew the danger. The owner also owes a nondelegable duty for…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Co. (2007)

    …construction materials. Surface Combustion, Inc. provided glass ovens, termed lehrs at Anchor Hocking Glass Company. \[2\] Two other defendants listed on the verdict sheet settled, and are not involved in these appeals. \[3\] Mesothelioma, a cancer…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 12, 2010 · in the opinion

    McGUFFIE v. Mead Corp. (2010)

    …even one that owns all the stock of a subsidiary corporation\[,\] is not subject to liability for the acts of its subsidiary unless the parent so controls the operation of the subsidiary as to make it…