7 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · January 22, 1997
Sharpless v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1997)
The trial court granted compulsory nonsuits for defendants Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Uniroyal and Harbison Walker Refractories against plaintiffs Dallas Sharpless and Richard Wilson, and issued this opinion explaining the nonsuits for their appeals. In a strict…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · June 10, 1986 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)
…Corporation, Turner & Newall Ltd., Certain-Teed U.S. Rubber Co., Inc., Pacor Industries, Celotex Corporation, Amatex Corporation, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Asbestos Textile Institute, Termoid Company, Philip Carey, Garlock, Industrial Products Division, Glen Alden, Inc., Rapid American…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 14, 1990
Bushless v. GAF Corp. (1990)
Four Babcock & Wilcox workers, Joseph Bushless, Ralph Barber, Lloyd Kelly and Robert Edmond, were diagnosed with asbestosis in 1987. Bushless and Kelly's wives joined their suits. They sued GAF and other makers and suppliers of asbestos products,…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 12, 2007 · in the opinion
Donoughe v. Lincoln Elec. Co. (2007)
…free to reject purportedly "unrebutted" evidence showing that the plaintiff could not have been injured by any asbestos exposure from the defendant's product. See Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028, 1033…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 5, 2014 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2014)
…Inc., 799 A.2d 71, 86 (Pa.Super.2002) (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 622-23 (Pa.Super.1999)) ("In asbestos litigation, evidence is sufficient to establish product identity where…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 5, 2013 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Airco Welders Supply (2013)
…a jury, the exposure at issue was not de minimis. See Smalls v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 843 A.2d 410 (Pa. Super. 2004); Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028 (Pa. Super. 2004…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · December 23, 2010 · in the opinion
Cowley v. Acands, Inc. (2010)
…consider it. \[5\] In oral argument, Plaintiff asserted that Pittsburgh Corning and Owens-Corning had the same motives as MCIC since these companies had a distributorship agreement with MCIC. (Transcript of Oral Argument at 7-8…