No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

22 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 8, 1996

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Keeton (1996)

    …spouses against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, rejecting all six of the company's points of error about evidence and the jury charge. Correspondence from other asbestos makers about known hazards was relevant to what Owens-Corning knew…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 14, 1998

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Sitz (1998)

    The court of appeals reversed the $20 million judgment for the Sitz family against Owens-Corning, holding the trial court wrongly applied offensive collateral estoppel on liability issues, and remanded the case. Offensive collateral estoppel should…

  3. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · June 5, 1998

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Malone (1998)

    The Texas Supreme Court affirmed both courts of appeals' judgments for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, holding any error in excluding OCF's mitigation evidence harmless and that the punitive awards, alone or aggregated with…

  4. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · February 14, 1996

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Wasiak (1996)

    The court affirmed the trial court's judgment for the plaintiffs (about $1.8 million compensatory and $3.7 million punitive damages) against Owens-Corning, overruling all eleven points of error. Under Alabama law and due…

  5. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 4, 1995

    Click v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1995)

    The appeals court reversed the directed verdict for Owens-Corning Fiberglass and Pittsburgh Corning and remanded for trial, ruling that the Click family had presented enough circumstantial evidence that George Click was exposed to the companies…

  6. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 5, 1999 · in the opinion

    Pittsburgh Corning Corp. v. Walters (1999)

    …February, 1995, defendant Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation filed a motion to take judicial notice of California law without any reference to or proof of that law. The trial court permitted PCC to adopt this motion. In…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · November 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1990)

    …transfer of an insolvent defendant's non-cash settlement obligation to the non-settling defendants under the present circumstances follows the ruling in McNair v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 890 F.2d 753 (5th Cir.1989).

  8. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 16, 1991 · in the opinion

    Fibreboard Corp. v. Pool (1991)

    …It was used in molded pipe covering form, as well as in a block. Owens-Illinois sold its insulation division to Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation effective April 30, 1958. Reuben Pool did not begin work at…

  9. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 26, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. Stephens (2007)

    …by defendant, and coworker testified that he used defendant's pipe covering approximately ninety percent of time and installed it in areas where plaintiff regularly worked). But cf. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 682 A…

  10. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · January 8, 1998 · in the opinion

    Fuller-Austin Insulation Co. v. Bilder (1998)

    …during the statutory settlement period of 180 days after suit was filed. Prejudgment interest accrues on the judgment rendered by the court, not on the verdict returned by the jury. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Schmidt…

  11. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 13, 2007 · in the opinion

    Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Stephens (2007)

    …by defendant, and coworker testified that he used defendant's pipe covering approximately ninety percent of time and installed it in areas where plaintiff regularly worked). But cf. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett, 343 Md…

  12. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 31, 2003 · in the opinion

    Brown & Root, Inc. v. Shelton (2003)

    …contractors who install such improvements from a perpetual threat of liability. See Petro Stopping Ctrs., Inc. v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 906 S.W.2d 618, 620 (Tex.App.El Paso 1995, no writ). If applicable…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas · May 27, 2002 · in the opinion

    Madden v. Able Supply Co. (2002)

    …344, 346 (S.D.Miss.1994); Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F.Supp.2d 653 (E.D.Tex.1999) (holding by implication that corporate defendants are § 1442(a)(1) defendants). In reaching their conclusion…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas · January 14, 1980

    Mooney v. Fibreboard Corp. (1980)

    R. L. Mooney, Sr. worked as an insulator from 1940 to 1970 and handled large quantities of insulation containing asbestos. He sued eleven companies that allegedly made or sold such products, under strict product liability, saying he had lung…

  15. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · October 22, 2010 · in the opinion

    Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2010)

    …where we gave immediate effect to a statute that repealed a special, statutory cause of action.\[126\] Crown analogizes this case to Owens Corning, which upheld the change in Texas law to allow a plaintiff no…

  16. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · August 29, 2008 · in the opinion

    Satterfield v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. (2008)

    …applied retroactively where doing so would destroy or impair vested rights. See Baker Hughes, 12 S.W.3d at 4; Owens Corning, 997 S.W.2d at 572-73; Likes, 962 S.W.2d at 502…

  17. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · April 19, 2007 · in the opinion

    Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Altimore (2007)

    …whether any exceptions to that duty applied, and whether Exxon satisfied that duty. Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 895 A.2d 1143 (N.J. 2006). \[27\] The plaintiffs were the stepdaughter of an insulation installer and…

  18. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 1, 2009 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Smith (2009)

    …or third party claim" and "Property owner" as "a person or entity that owns real property primarily used for commercial or business purposes"). We note that our sister court has recently issued a plurality opinion questioning…

  19. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · May 8, 2015 · in the opinion

    Abutahoun v. Dow Chemical Company (2015)

    …Chapter 95. Instead, the chapter uses the phrase "property owner," which section 95.001(3) defines to mean "a person or entity that owns real property primarily used for commercial or business purposes." TEX. CIV. PRAC…

  20. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Alcoa, Inc. v. Behringer (2007)

    …Siegler, 899 S.W.2d 195, 197 (Tex.1995) ("The threshold inquiry in a negligence case is whether the defendant owes a legal duty to the plaintiff."). If there is no legal duty, liability for negligence…