No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 1992

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson (1992)

    The Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed the judgment for Watson's estate against Owens-Corning, upholding the compensatory and punitive damages awarded by the jury. A manufacturer has a duty to warn only if it knows…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · July 31, 1986

    Saunders v. HK Porter Co., Inc. (1986)

    Three land-based shipyard workers, Melvin Saunders, George Pruden and John Grimes, sued asbestos manufacturers in federal court in Virginia over asbestosis. Defendants moved to dismiss or for summary judgment, saying the claims were filed too late.…

  3. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 2013 · in the opinion

    Ford Motor Co. v. Boomer (2013)

    …determine whether an exposure was causal. See, e.g., Code § 8.01-249(4) (addressing the statute of limitations for latent mesothelioma cases); see also Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson, 243 Va. 128, 143-44…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Virginia · November 19, 2015 · in the opinion

    Wilson v. AC&S, Inc. (2015)

    …Paper Corporation; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Rapid American Corporation; Selby, Battersby & Co.; Uniroyal, Inc.; Waco Insulation, Inc.; Garlock, Inc.; and Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. ECF No. 1-1. \[3\] See also Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782…

  5. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · November 4, 2005 · in the opinion

    Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC v. Little (2005)

    …Richard S. Glasser, Norfolk; Patten, Wornom, Hatten & Diamonstein, Newport News; Glasser & Glasser, Norfolk, on brief), for appellee. Owens-Illinois, Inc., John Crane, Inc., Dana Corp., Lincoln Elec. Co., Hobart Bros., and S.B. Decking Co., Inc. …

  6. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · October 11, 2018 · in the opinion

    Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2018)

    …2002) ("\[T\]he reasonably expected use of asbestos products encompasses the cleaning of asbestos residue from one's person and clothing at the end of the workday."); Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 895 A.2d 1143…