13 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 9, 2023 · in the opinion
Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)
…with maritime law, is that the plaintiff show "more than a casual or minimum contact with the product" to hold the defendant liable. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prod., 69 F.3d 712, 716 …
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 3, 2014 · in the opinion
Farrow v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)
…the meaning of the rule. See Horne v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 4 [\867] F.3d 276, 282 (4th Cir.1993); O'Banion v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 968 F.2d 1011, 1015 (10th Cir.1992…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · December 11, 2008 · in the opinion
Braaten v. Saberhagen Holdings (2008)
…product which because of a defect or unsafe use is itself unsafe); Fricke v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 618 So.2d 473 (La.Ct.App. 1993) (manufacturer is not liable for inadequate warnings regarding a product…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 22, 2018 · in the opinion
Barabin v. AstenJOHNSON (2018)
…M.H. Detrick, National Gypsum Co., Nicolet/Keasby-Mattison, North American Refractories Company, North American Asbestos Corp., Owens Corning, Pacor, Plibrico Co., Pittsburgh Corning, Porter Hayden, Prudential Lines, Raybestos-Manhattan, Raymark Industries, Raytech Industries Corp., Rock…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion
Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2009)
…is no reasonable inference that he removed and replaced the original asbestos insulation. The estate also points to certain documents obtained during discovery from the Selas Corporation.\[16\] One document refers to Owens-Corning Kaylo 20…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 8, 2011 · in the opinion
Wangen v. AW Chesterton Company (2011)
…COMPANY, INC.; LESLIE CONTROLS, INC.; THE LUNKENHEIMER COMPANY; METALCLAD INSULATION CORPORATION; NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.; OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.; PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION, as successor-in-interest to SACOMO-SIERRA; PLANT INSULATION COMPANY; QUINTEC INDUSTRIES, INC.; RAPID AMERICAN…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Estenson v. Caterpillar Inc. (2015)
…Virginia Leeper, The Gaitan Group, 3131 Elliott Ave. Ste. 700, Seattle, WA, 98121-1047, Counsel for Appellant(s). Thomas J. Owens, Attorney at Law, 1001 4th Ave. Ste. 4400, Seattle, WA, 98154-1192, Brian P. Barrow…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 20, 2006 · in the opinion
Moore v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (2006)
…MOTORCYCLES; INDIAN MOTORCYCLES; KAWASAKI MOTORS CORP., USA; MARLOTTS; MCGOODIES; METROPOLITIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; MOTO GUZZI MOTORCYCLE; NORTON MOTORCYCLES; OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.; PACCAR, INC.; PNEUMO ABEX CORPORATION; ROCKY POINT CYCLE; STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC.; THURMAN INDUSTRIES, INC…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 18, 2011 · in the opinion
Yankee v. APV North America, Inc. (2011)
…Claude F. Bosworth, Rizzo Mattingly Bosworth PC, Portland, OR, for Petitioner/Respondent, APV North America, Inc. Thomas J. Owens, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondent/Appellant, Sandra Yankee & Renata Needles. SCHINDLER, J. ¶ 1 In Braaten…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 5, 2021
Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…factor, with evidence of the amount and duration of exposure. A manufacturer owes a duty to warn about third-party replacement parts only if its product requires the part to function as intended. Causation; Product Identification…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 3, 2017 · in the opinion
Woo v. General Electric Company (2017)
…Under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 388, a manufacturer owes a duty to warn of hazards for the use of a product that are or should be known to a manufacturer. Simonetta, 165 Wn.2d at 348. …
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 8, 2010 · in the opinion
Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2010)
…2d at 248). While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court held that a manufacturer owes no common law duty to warn of the hazards of asbestos insulation that it did not manufacture, sell, or supply…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 31, 2011 · in the opinion
Morgan v. Aurora Pump Co. (2011)
…cases, the Washington Supreme Court held, in relevant part, that a manufacturer owes no common law duty to warn of the hazards of an asbestos-containing product that it did not manufacture, sell, or supply. Simonetta…