10 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 31, 1995
Brewer v. Fibreboard Corp. (1995)
…$21,000 actually received, and remanded for recalculation of the judgment against Fibreboard, Owens-Corning Fiberglas and Pittsburgh Corning at $290,643.56, a result favoring the Brewers. Under RCW 4.22.060, a settlement found…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 9, 2023 · in the opinion
Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)
…with maritime law, is that the plaintiff show "more than a casual or minimum contact with the product" to hold the defendant liable. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prod., 69 F.3d 712, 716 …
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion
Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2009)
…is no reasonable inference that he removed and replaced the original asbestos insulation. The estate also points to certain documents obtained during discovery from the Selas Corporation.\[16\] One document refers to Owens-Corning Kaylo 20…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · December 11, 2008 · in the opinion
Simonetta v. Viad Corporation (2008)
…388 (§ 388), a product manufacturer owes a duty to warn of hazards involved in the use of its product, which are known or should be known to the manufacturer and are not obvious to the user…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 18, 2011 · in the opinion
Yankee v. APV North America, Inc. (2011)
…Claude F. Bosworth, Rizzo Mattingly Bosworth PC, Portland, OR, for Petitioner/Respondent, APV North America, Inc. Thomas J. Owens, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondent/Appellant, Sandra Yankee & Renata Needles. SCHINDLER, J. ¶ 1 In Braaten…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · November 1, 2018 · in the opinion
Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2018)
…to whether reasonable consumers could conclude that Pfizer was an apparent manufacture of the asbestos products, we reverse the Court of Appeals and remand for further proceedings. WE CONCUR: Johnson, J. Owens, J. Madsen, J. Wiggins…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 5, 2021
Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…factor, with evidence of the amount and duration of exposure. A manufacturer owes a duty to warn about third-party replacement parts only if its product requires the part to function as intended. Causation; Product Identification…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion
Rublee v. Carrier Corporation (2017)
…Jan. 12, 2015) (court order). \[12\] Owen v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R. Co., 153 Wn.2d 780, 787, 108 P.3d 1220 (2005). \[13\] Owen, 153 Wn.2d at 787. \[14\] Lybbert v. Grant…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 3, 2017 · in the opinion
Woo v. General Electric Company (2017)
…Under Restatement (Second) of Torts § 388, a manufacturer owes a duty to warn of hazards for the use of a product that are or should be known to a manufacturer. Simonetta, 165 Wn.2d at 348. …
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016 · in the opinion
Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)
…Jan. 12, 2015) (court order). \[12\] Owen v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R. Co., 153 Wash.2d 780, 787, 108 P.3d 1220 (2005). \[13\] Owen, 153 Wash.2d at 787, 108 P.3d 1220…