8 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 6, 1996
Viereck v. Fibreboard Corp. (1996)
The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment on the jury verdict for Virgil Viereck's estate and his wife Julia Viereck against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, holding that pre-WPLA law applied and that the evidentiary rulings…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 14, 2005 · in the opinion
Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2005)
…risk of personal injury and/or property damage. Id. Bystanders may recover for personal injuries or wrongful death caused by exposure to asbestos. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Martin, 942 S.W.2d 712 (Tex…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 23, 2017 · in the opinion
Estate OF Brandes v. Brand Insulations, Inc. (2017)
…insulated cement. Brand selected PABCO to supply the majority of the insulation for the project. Johns-Manville and Owens Corning product was also used. Brand selected PABCO material because it was the cheapest to ship. Brand…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 22, 2018 · in the opinion
Barabin v. AstenJOHNSON (2018)
…M.H. Detrick, National Gypsum Co., Nicolet/Keasby-Mattison, North American Refractories Company, North American Asbestos Corp., Owens Corning, Pacor, Plibrico Co., Pittsburgh Corning, Porter Hayden, Prudential Lines, Raybestos-Manhattan, Raymark Industries, Raytech Industries Corp., Rock…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 3, 2023 · in the opinion
Wright v. 3M Co. (2023)
…We affirm the Court of Appeals and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with the opinions on appeal. WE CONCUR: González, C.J. Johnson, J. Owens, J. Stephens, J. Montoya-Lewis, J. Whitener…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · June 4, 2009 · in the opinion
Lunsford v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2009)
…the Court of Appeals and hold the trial court erred by dismissing Lunsford's strict product liability claims [\1104] against Saberhagen. We remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. WE CONCUR: SUSAN OWENS, CHARLES W…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · January 12, 2022 · in the opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty v. Ulbricht (2022)
…USF&G, Defendants contend, "has thus far refused to pay anything towards the accrued interest" and therefore "owes at least $171,172.60" in interest on the $4.5 million covenant judgment. (Id.) However, the record…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 13, 2021 · in the opinion
Wright v. 3M Company (2021)
…landowner's premises. Id. The parties do not dispute Wright's status as an invitee. A landowner owes an invitee the duty of care set forth in the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 343 (Am Law Inst.