No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

4 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 24, 2009 · in the opinion

    Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2009)

    …is no reasonable inference that he removed and replaced the original asbestos insulation. The estate also points to certain documents obtained during discovery from the Selas Corporation.\[16\] One document refers to Owens-Corning Kaylo 20…

  2. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · November 1, 2018 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2018)

    …to whether reasonable consumers could conclude that Pfizer was an apparent manufacture of the asbestos products, we reverse the Court of Appeals and remand for further proceedings. WE CONCUR: Johnson, J. Owens, J. Madsen, J. Wiggins…

  3. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Cashman v. Pacific Scientific Company (2010)

    …2d at 248). While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court held that a manufacturer owes no common law duty to warn of the hazards of asbestos insulation that it did not manufacture, sell, or supply…

  4. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)

    …Jan. 12, 2015) (court order). \[12\] Owen v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R. Co., 153 Wash.2d 780, 787, 108 P.3d 1220 (2005). \[13\] Owen, 153 Wash.2d at 787, 108 P.3d 1220…