No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

23 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 28, 1997

    Mavroudis v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (1997)

    The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment for the Mavroudis plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. and affirmed the trial court's finding that the pretrial settlements were reasonable. In multi-supplier asbestos cases where the…

  2. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 13, 1993

    Krivanek v. Fibreboard Corp. (1993)

    The court affirmed the liability finding against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and the damages awards to Mr. Krivanek's estate and children, but reversed the denial of a new trial on Mrs. Krivanek's damages and remanded…

  3. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 31, 1995

    Brewer v. Fibreboard Corp. (1995)

    …$21,000 actually received, and remanded for recalculation of the judgment against Fibreboard, Owens-Corning Fiberglas and Pittsburgh Corning at $290,643.56, a result favoring the Brewers. Under RCW 4.22.060, a settlement found…

  4. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 22, 1999

    Miller v. Foster Wheeler Co. (1999)

    Creighton Miller, as administrator of the estates of seamen William Blecker and Willie Holmes, sued a large group of manufacturers and shipping companies. Blecker was diagnosed with mesothelioma in August 1989 and died in October 1992. Holmes was…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · February 11, 2015 · in the opinion

    McCROSSIN v. Imo Industries, Inc. (2015)

    …alleges that the two contractors who performed work on the Trenton were nonparties Owens Corning Fiberglass ("Owens") and Unicor. Id., at 6. Lone Star further alleges that neither Owens nor Unicor supplied any products to Pioneer…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · March 9, 2023 · in the opinion

    Deem v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2023)

    …with maritime law, is that the plaintiff show "more than a casual or minimum contact with the product" to hold the defendant liable. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prod., 69 F.3d 712, 716 …

  7. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    Farrow v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)

    …the meaning of the rule. See Horne v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 4 [\867] F.3d 276, 282 (4th Cir.1993); O'Banion v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 968 F.2d 1011, 1015 (10th Cir.1992…

  8. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · November 25, 2002 · in the opinion

    Campbell v. Lockheed Shipbuilding Corp. (2002)

    …federal district court case, Greene v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 682 F.Supp. 304 (M.D.La.1988). In Greene, the plaintiff, while employed by Owens-Corning as a insulator, had been exposed to asbestos. Later…

  9. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 31, 2010 · in the opinion

    Arnold v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2010)

    …on Navy ships at Lockheed for another contractor, either Unicor, Incorporated, or Owens Corning.\[3\] Reuben was a member of the insulators workers' union. Reuben was never a Lockheed employee. ¶ 3 Insulators at Lockheed's shipyard…

  10. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 18, 1989

    IN the Matter of Estate OF Foster (1989)

    Kathryn Koehler, personal representative of Edwin Foster's estate, sued asbestos insulation manufacturers, including Fibreboard and Owens-Illinois, alleging improper design and lack of warnings. Foster developed mesothelioma, which the estate attributed to asbestos exposure at…

  11. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · July 16, 1992

    Bowers v. Fibreboard Corporation (1992)

    The Court of Appeals affirmed the jury verdicts for the plaintiffs (the Eldredge and Williams estates and Mrs. Eldredge) against Fibreboard and Owens-Illinois, finding no error in the jury instruction or the evidence rulings; Celotex…

  12. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · August 1, 2022

    Carroll v. Akebono Brake Corporation (2022)

    …order striking Marjorie Carroll's complaint against Nissan as a discovery sanction and remanded, and affirmed the $1,000 fee sanction against attorney Owens, rejecting Nissan's cross-appeal. A court may strike a complaint as…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    Kraemer v. Lone Star Industries (2021)

    …military contactor defense. The plaintiffs introduced significant evidence below that the insulation sold by Fibreboard and Owens-Illinois to the Navy was the very same insulation which those companies marketed to commercial buyers. This insulation was…

  14. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · November 1, 2018 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2018)

    …to whether reasonable consumers could conclude that Pfizer was an apparent manufacture of the asbestos products, we reverse the Court of Appeals and remand for further proceedings. WE CONCUR: Johnson, J. Owens, J. Madsen, J. Wiggins…

  15. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2012 · in the opinion

    Macias v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc. (2012)

    …To hold manufacturers of safety equipment liable for harm caused by other manufacturers' dangerous products is contrary to precedent and public policy. I dissent. WE CONCUR: CHARLES W. JOHNSON and SUSAN OWENS, Justices, and GERRY L…

  16. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2007 · in the opinion

    Herring v. Texaco, Inc. (2007)

    …Appeals and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. WE CONCUR: GERRY L. ALEXANDER, C.J., and CHARLES W. JOHNSON, SUSAN OWENS, BARBARA A. MADSEN, MARY E. FAIRHURST, RICHARD B. SANDERS…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 26, 2013 · in the opinion

    Hoyt v. Lockheed Shipbuilding Company (2013)

    …Court does not read the Supreme Court's footnote in Simonetta as a wholesale rejection of the relevance of foreseeability to the analysis of whether a party owes a duty of care in a particular situation…

  18. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · January 24, 2023

    Buckholtz v. American Optical Corporation (2023)

    …it remanded to vacate the judgment against Zidell Explorations and for a new trial. A company that owns a ship being dismantled and retains the right to control the work can owe a duty to the…

  19. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · December 14, 2010 · in the opinion

    Macias v. Mine Safety Appliances Co. (2010)

    …manufactured. ¶ 17 Macias argues that the purpose of a manufacturer's product is relevant to the question of whether the manufacturer owes a duty to warn of the dangers of another manufacturer's hazardous product. In…

  20. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corporation (2017)

    …Jan. 12, 2015) (court order). \[12\] Owen v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R. Co., 153 Wn.2d 780, 787, 108 P.3d 1220 (2005). \[13\] Owen, 153 Wn.2d at 787. \[14\] Lybbert v. Grant…