No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

118 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 6

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's orders staying the Hansens' California asbestos actions against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and others on forum non conveniens grounds, so the plaintiffs lost and were directed to file…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · April 7, 1981

    Clutter v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1981)

    Three Ohio plaintiffs, Russell Clutter (whose widow continued his suit), George Dwiggins and Martin McGreevey, sued makers of asbestos products in federal court. Clutter had pleural mesothelioma and was exposed while dismantling a chemical plant and…

  3. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · December 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2019)

    …ago, in McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill. 2d 102, 241 Ill.Dec. 787, 720 N.E.2d 242 (1999), we held that jury verdicts entered against Owens Corning and Owens-Illinois, Inc., based…

  4. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2021)

    …of two or more persons for the purpose of accomplishing by concerted action either an unlawful purpose or a lawful purpose by unlawful means." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill…

  5. Court case · Missouri Supreme Court · September 10, 1991 · in the opinion

    Hagen v. Celotex Corp. (1991)

    …when it sold its Kaylo division to Owens-Corning Fiberglass. It has not manufactured or distributed any product containing asbestos since then. The parties stipulated that Owens-Illinois was not liable for exposure to Kaylo occurring…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 28, 2003 · in the opinion

    Ferris v. Gatke Corporation (2003)

    …Cal.App.4th 1409, 1415-1416 \[37 Cal.Rptr.2d 902\].) If there has been no exposure, there is no causation." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655, 33 Cal…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 12, 2022 · in the opinion

    Williams v. Boeing Company (2022)

    …claims, and therefore did not interrupt prescription with respect to these claims." Both parties consider a 1996 district court opinion to be helpful to their arguments. See Lagan v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., No. 80-4338…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 26, 2017 · in the opinion

    City of Pasadena v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2017)

    …when addressing statutes of limitations applicable to latent diseases such as mesothelioma. In Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 520 (Buttram), our Supreme Court noted that "as a general proposition it is…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 29, 2007 · in the opinion

    Bakkie v. Union Carbide Corporation (2007)

    …v. Superior Court (1995) 9 Cal.4th 559, 571.) Union Carbide's reliance on Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 is similarly unavailing. In Dumin, the plaintiff could not establish…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022 · in the opinion

    Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)

    …in a manner that could not reasonably be foreseen by the defendant" bars recovery where such misuse proximately caused the injury. Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 721 n.14 (4th Cir…

  11. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rondon v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2016)

    …is imposed for three types of product defects: manufacturing defects, design defects, and warning defects. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d 549\] (Anderson).…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · April 12, 2007 · in the opinion

    Hilbert v. Aeroquip, Inc. (2007)

    …Hilbert has attempted to avoid removal by narrowing his complaint. See Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F.Supp.2d 653, 658 (E.D.Tex.1999) ("once a defendant properly removes a case to federal…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 28, 2015 · in the opinion

    Marteney v. Union Carbide Corp. (2015)

    …manufacturer's failure to warn rendered the product unsafe to its users.'" (Ibid., quoting Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1993) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1003.) The jury returned special verdicts that appellants were not negligent…

  14. Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 14, 2006 · in the opinion

    Quarles v. Advocate Mines Limited (2006)

    …person standard. It stresses that negligence, even in a failure-to-warn context, requires proof of the standard of care (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994-995, 1001-1004), and…

  15. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 11, 2009 · in the opinion

    Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts Co. (2009)

    …2000 PA Super 203, 757 A.2d 367, 376 (Pa.Super.2000), and Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 PA Super 82, 729 A.2d 614, 623 (Pa.Super.1999)). [\1176] Like the common pleas…

  16. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2012 · in the opinion

    Barker v. Hennessy Industries, Inc. (2012)

    …defects: Manufacturing defects, design defects, and "\warning defects,' i.e., inadequate warnings or failures to warn."\[4\] (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995 \[281 Cal.Rptr. 528, 810 P.2d…

  17. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 30, 2010 · in the opinion

    Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2010)

    …is \[a\] significant and substantial contributing factor to the \[plaintiff's\] asbestos related disease." Smalls v. Pittsburgh-Corning, 843 A.2d 410, 414 (Pa.Super.2004); Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida · September 25, 2018 · in the opinion

    Doolin v. Ford Motor Company (2018)

    …Ct. App. 2016); Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So. 2d 443, 456 (Ala. 1992) (finding summary judgment was inappropriate where evidence showed the decedent worked close to where asbestos products were used and expert…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 25, 2021 · in the opinion

    Putt v. Ford Motor Co. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2021)

    …does not equal absolute liability. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 994.) Because all Ford offered the jury was a "vague impression that \[the\] other products \[were\] somewhat similar," because Ford…

  20. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)

    … 1447(d) (emphasis added). We construed that language [\388] in Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124 (3d Cir.1998), where we held that "section 1447(d) prohibits review of remand orders \whether…