No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

46 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 3

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 18, 2000

    Barnes v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2000)

    …court's judgments, upholding the denial of new trials, so the estates of Beckmann and Rogers lost and Owens-Corning won. Under Kentucky's apportionment statute, fault may be apportioned only to parties, dismissed or settling…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · September 30, 1998

    Pustejovsky v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp. (1998)

    The court affirmed summary judgment for Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Pittsburgh Corning and Rapid-American, holding the widow's mesothelioma claim was barred by limitations because it accrued in 1982 with the asbestosis diagnosis. Under Texas's…

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 22, 1996

    Egan v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. (1996)

    The appeals court affirmed the bench-trial judgment against Owens-Corning Fiberglass (OCF), including the $350,000 general damages award and the set-off ruling, and rejected the plaintiff's request for punitive damages under Ohio…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 6, 1995

    Harris v. AC & S, Inc. (1995)

    The court granted summary judgment to Pittsburgh Corning, Owens-Corning, Anchor Packing and Garlock, and in part to Georgia-Pacific (for Bestwall). It denied it to John Crane, to Georgia-Pacific on its joint compound, and…

  5. Court case · Arkansas Supreme Court · December 15, 2016 · in the opinion

    Hendrix v. Alcoa, Inc. (2016)

    … Ganske v. Spahn & Rose Lumber Co., 580 N.W.2d 812 (Iowa 1998); Tomlinson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 244 Kan. 506, 770 P.2d 833 (1989). Only the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in Tooey…

  6. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 26, 2011 · in the opinion

    Galicinao v. McMASTER Carr Supply Company (2011)

    …the plaintiff proves the defendant's product was at his or her work site. \[Citation.\]" (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 655 (Dumin).) Our Supreme Court in Rutherford specifically declined…

  7. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    Hebert v. Anco Insulation, Inc. (2002)

    …Additionally, the jury concluded that six manufacturers with whom plaintiffs had settled prior to trial, Garlock Corporation, Johns-Manville Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. and Flexitallic Gasket Company, Inc…

  8. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · April 19, 2007 · in the opinion

    Satterfield v. Breeding Insulation Company, Inc. (2007)

    …Widera, 611 N.Y.S.2d at 569-71. \[10\] Alcoa also cites Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 965 F.2d 844 (10th Cir. 1992); Adams v. Owens-Ill., Inc., 705 A.2d 58 (Md…

  9. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 15, 2008 · in the opinion

    Sarkozy v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2008)

    …CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., PFIZER, INC., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PPG INDUSTRIES, INC., formerly known as Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, individually and as successor to and/or alter ego of Pittsburgh Corning Corporation…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · February 21, 2014 · in the opinion

    McGUFFIE v. Mead Corporation (2014)

    …Ltd., 998 P.2d 405, 413 (Ca. 2000) (adopting the two-injury rule in California); Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 601 N.W. 2d 627, 636 (Wis. 1999) (adopting the two-injury rule in Wisconsin)…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · March 23, 2011 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2011)

    …133 A.2d 428 (1957). The fact, however, that a party has been sued or threatened with suit is not enough to establish joint tort-feasor status. See Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Inc. v. Garrett, 343 Md…

  12. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · December 29, 2009 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2009)

    …to the Cross-Defendants' products than to Scapa's products, and that the jury's verdict is therefore inconsistent and warrants a JNOV.\[5\] As the Court of Appeals explained in Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 2, 2010 · in the opinion

    Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2010)

    …to the Cross-Defendants' products than to Scapa's products, and that the jury's verdict is therefore inconsistent and warrants a JNOV.\[5\] As the Court of Appeals explained in Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · May 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Coleman v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2017)

    …Plaintiffs' more specific requests regarding asbestos or that such generalized requests are proportional to the needs of the case at this juncture. Plaintiffs assert that Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 878 So.2d 631 (La…

  15. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 19, 2008 · in the opinion

    Wright v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)

    …to give rise to a reasonable inference that he inhaled asbestos fibers from the product. See Coward v. Owens-Corning, 729 A.2d 614, 622-623 (Pa.Super.1999) (evidence must demonstrate that the plaintiff worked…

  16. Industry

    Asbestos Exposure in Glass, Aluminum, and Cement Plant Workers

    …several sources at once: the bankruptcy trusts of asbestos makers like A.P. Green, Harbison-Walker, Johns-Manville, and Owens-Corning; lawsuits against the glass, aluminum, or cement company that owned the plant; and disability benefits…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 8, 2018 · in the opinion

    Foglia v. Moore Dry Dock Company (2018)

    …Howard v. Owens Corning (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 621, 633 \[\the opinion of any expert witness "is only as good as the facts and reasons on which it is based"' and a fact finder ought…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …C. 2007). The South Carolina Supreme Court has adopted the "frequency, regularity and proximity test" set forth by the Fourth Circuit in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986). Henderson, 644…

  19. Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · April 3, 2008

    State EX rel. Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (2008)

    …Supreme Court reversed the court of appeals' mandamus grant and held that the Industrial Commission did not abuse its discretion in naming Pilkington, successor to Libbey Owens Ford's self-insured claims, as the amenable employer…

  20. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · March 8, 2007

    State EX rel. Pilkington N. AM. v. Indus. Comm. (2007)

    …Apportionment and Settlement Credits Worksites: Libbey-Owens-Ford Rossford plant; Libbey-Owens-Ford Rossford plant (Plant 6 and Thermopane Plant 9), Rossford laborer, furnace tender, and crew leader Libbey-Owens-Ford Rossford plant (Plant 6 and…