No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

13 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 14, 1999

    Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    The Superior Court affirmed the trial court's denial of Owens-Corning's motions for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial, leaving the plaintiffs' verdicts and the judgment entered for them in place. Where…

  2. Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · March 6, 1997

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Henkel (1997)

    The D.C. Court of Appeals affirmed the judgments for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, rejecting its Batson, state-of-the-art evidence and statute of limitations challenges. A Batson objection must be raised before…

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 23, 2005

    Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2005)

    Thomas Jefferson was one of several hundred plaintiffs suing over asbestos exposure. His claim against his former employer, Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring, alleged that he worked for Cooper as a longshoreman on the Mississippi River in 1965 and at…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 20, 1981

    Carbonaro v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1981)

    The federal court granted Owens-Corning Fiberglas's motion for summary judgment, holding the plaintiffs' asbestos suit barred by the prior state-court judgment for the defendants, so the plaintiffs lost. Under claim preclusion, a final…

  5. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · March 25, 1991

    Landrigan v. Celotex Corp. (1991)

    The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed the Appellate Division, set aside the directed verdict for Owens-Corning and Owens Illinois, and remanded for retrial, so plaintiff Angelina Landrigan won. Under Rubanick, an expert's causation opinion…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 29, 1998 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Owens-Illinois (1998)

    …percent of the cases where no asbestos exposure is involved, according to one of appellant's own medical experts. The credibility of the witnesses was for the jury to determine. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · July 23, 1993 · in the opinion

    Maiorana v. United States Mineral Prods. Co. (In re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit., 1993)

    …individually and successor-in-interest to Keasbey-Mattison Company; Raymark Industries, Inc.; individually and as successor-in-interest to Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.; Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.; U.S. Mineral Products Company; H.K. Porter Company, Inc.…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)

    … 1447(d) (emphasis added). We construed that language [\388] in Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124 (3d Cir.1998), where we held that "section 1447(d) prohibits review of remand orders \whether…

  9. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · February 27, 1992 · in the opinion

    Betts v. Manville Personal Injury Trust (1992)

    …720, 101 Ill.Dec. 193, 195, 498 N.E.2d 375, 377; see also Wolford v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1988), 176 Ill.App.3d 312, 314, 125 Ill.Dec. 563, 564, 530 N.E.2d…

  10. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 31, 2007

    Penn v. A-Best Prods. Co. (2007)

    Eight Ohio workers or their estates sued many companies, claiming asbestos-related diseases from their employment. Hubbard, Siegel and Price had colon cancer; Williams had laryngeal cancer; Ward had lung cancer; Roth, Penn and Harrison had…

  11. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 2, 2022 · in the opinion

    Nuckols v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2022)

    …nevertheless, that there existed factual disputes regarding when plaintiff first had a duty to investigate whether his exposure to diesel exhaust may have been a cause of his cancers. See also Owens v. Union Pacific RR…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2014

    Haver v. BNSF Railway Co. (2014)

    …Ford Motor Co., a premises owner owes no duty of care to family members of workers who are secondarily exposed to asbestos off the premises, whether the worker was employed by the owner or by a…

  13. Court case · West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals · October 16, 1991 · in the opinion

    Newman v. Richardson (1991)

    …Scott S. Segal, Jeffery V. Mehalic, Hostler and Segal, Charleston, for petitioners. Mario Palumbo, Atty. Gen., C. Terry Owen, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Charleston, for respondent. [\707] NEELY, Justice: Margaret A. Newman, Eloise J. Sims and…