No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

303 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 16

  1. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 1992

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson (1992)

    The Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed the judgment for Watson's estate against Owens-Corning, upholding the compensatory and punitive damages awarded by the jury. A manufacturer has a duty to warn only if it knows…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · June 30, 1992

    O'banion v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1992)

    The Tenth Circuit affirmed the judgment entered on a jury verdict for Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. against Stanley and Louise O'Banion, finding no reversible error. A court may exclude cancer evidence under Rule 403 in…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 14, 1999

    Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    The Superior Court affirmed the trial court's denial of Owens-Corning's motions for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial, leaving the plaintiffs' verdicts and the judgment entered for them in place. Where…

  4. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 30, 1996

    Thalman v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1996)

    The appellate court affirmed the jury's damages award against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, reversed the trial judge's remittitur of the loss of consortium and wrongful death awards, and remanded for an amended judgment reflecting the…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 22, 1994

    Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Owens-Corning Fiberglas, holding that the trial court correctly directed a verdict against Dumin on exposure to OCF Kaylo aboard the Pocono because the evidence was insufficient. Even…

  6. Court case · Kentucky Supreme Court · August 24, 2000

    Carroll v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2000)

    …s lung cancer claim was not time-barred, which favors the plaintiff over the asbestos defendants (Owens-Corning and others). Asbestosis and lung cancer are separate and distinct diseases, so a cause of action for lung…

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 11, 1998

    McCauley v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    Bradley McCauley sued Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Pittsburgh Corning and other companies in May 1993, alleging asbestos-related diseases from occupational exposure during work from 1947 to 1986 in construction, as a laborer and plumber. A 1985…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit · January 31, 1990

    Kraciun v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1990)

    Six longtime workers at the E.I. du Pont plant in Clinton, Iowa, and their wives sued makers of asbestos insulation products. The workers said they were exposed through insulation on pipes and boilers, and in some cases through cleaning out machine…

  9. Court case · California Supreme Court · August 18, 1997

    Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997)

    …holding the accrual test wrong and remanding; this favors defendant Owens-Corning. For deciding whether Proposition 51 can be applied prospectively, a cause of action for a latent disease like mesothelioma accrues when the plaintiff is…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 13, 1996

    Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's orders staying the Hansens' California asbestos actions against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and others on forum non conveniens grounds, so the plaintiffs lost and were directed to file…

  11. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · April 29, 1999

    Spain v. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1999)

    The appellate court affirmed the $1.8 million jury verdict for plaintiff Shirley Spain against Owens Corning Fiberglass, rejecting its challenges to causation, evidence exclusion, the jury instruction, and the denial of a new trial or…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Iowa · November 22, 1994

    Perrin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    The district court granted summary judgment to defendants Owens Illinois, Owens Corning and Fibreboard and third-party defendant Flintkote, and denied the Perrins' request to shift the burden of proof on causation. Under Iowa law, evidence…

  13. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · April 2, 2004

    Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2004)

    Wesley Roberts, Jr., a pipefitter from 1941 to 1981, was exposed to asbestos-containing products at the Exxon refinery in Baton Rouge and other sites. He was diagnosed with mesothelioma in 1994 and died in 1995. He and his wife sued many…

  14. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 28, 1997

    Mavroudis v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (1997)

    The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment for the Mavroudis plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. and affirmed the trial court's finding that the pretrial settlements were reasonable. In multi-supplier asbestos cases where the…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 30, 2004

    Cadlo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (2004)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Owens-Illinois, upholding the demurrer to the fraud, misrepresentation and concert-of-action claims and the summary judgment on the product claims, against plaintiffs Anthony and Maxlyn Cadlo…

  16. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · June 30, 1992

    Feldman v. Owens-Illinois (In re Brooklyn Navy Yard Asbestos Litigation, 1992)

    Workers at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, and families of those who died, sued makers of asbestos insulation products for diseases including lung cancer, colon cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, pleural disease and asbestosis. The jury, in a joint…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 1, 1999 · in the opinion

    Owens Corning v. Bauman (1999)

    …Owens Corning now asks us to reject the onset-of-disease standard of Grimshaw, thereby reversing that decision, and to adopt the manifestation of physical impairment/diagnosis standard\[3\] of Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 26, 1999 · in the opinion

    Howard v. Owens Corning (1999)

    …1\] Howard's original personal injury complaint sued respondent Owens Corning under the company's former name of Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation. Throughout this litigation, the parties have referred to Owens Corning under its new name…

  19. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 21, 1998

    Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. (1998)

    The court affirmed the jury verdicts for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Kaylo insulation) and Rock Wool (One Shot cement), reversed the judgments against Garlock, A.W. Chesterton and Flexitallic, affirmed the judgments against Abadie…

  20. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · August 1, 1989

    Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1989)

    Roger Mauro and his wife sued several asbestos product makers. Mauro had worked as a repairman and then a plumber-steamfitter at Ancora State Psychiatric Hospital from 1964 into the late 1970s. He tore out old insulation and installed new, using or…