No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

35 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 14, 1999

    Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    The Superior Court affirmed the trial court's denial of Owens-Corning's motions for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial, leaving the plaintiffs' verdicts and the judgment entered for them in place. Where…

  2. Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · March 6, 1997

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Henkel (1997)

    The D.C. Court of Appeals affirmed the judgments for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, rejecting its Batson, state-of-the-art evidence and statute of limitations challenges. A Batson objection must be raised before…

  3. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · April 29, 1999

    Spain v. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1999)

    The appellate court affirmed the $1.8 million jury verdict for plaintiff Shirley Spain against Owens Corning Fiberglass, rejecting its challenges to causation, evidence exclusion, the jury instruction, and the denial of a new trial or…

  4. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 29, 1998 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Owens-Illinois (1998)

    …percent of the cases where no asbestos exposure is involved, according to one of appellant's own medical experts. The credibility of the witnesses was for the jury to determine. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett…

  5. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 23, 1997 · in the opinion

    Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley (1997)

    …see, e. g., Herber v. Johns-Manville Corp., 785 F. 2d 79, 85 (CA3 1986); Mauro v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 225 N. J. Super. 196, 542 A. 2d 16 (App. Div. 1988). But with only…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 12, 2007 · in the opinion

    Donoughe v. Lincoln Elec. Co. (2007)

    …free to reject purportedly "unrebutted" evidence showing that the plaintiff could not have been injured by any asbestos exposure from the defendant's product. See Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028, 1033…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · April 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Connor v. Covil Corporation (2021)

    …For instance, Appellant cites Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, where we affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on the issue of causation. See 69 F.3d at 716…

  8. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 2008 · in the opinion

    Thibodeaux v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2008)

    …4 Cir. 6/28/06), 936 So.2d 209, 213, citing, Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 03-0248 (La.App. 1 Cir. 4/2/04), 878 So.2d 631, 642. In Louisiana courts, "\[t\]he…

  9. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Illinois Central R. Co. (2015)

    …1987); Kochan v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 242 Ill.App.3d 781, 182 Ill.Dec. 814, 610 N.E.2d 683 (1993); and Spain v. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp., 304 Ill.App.3d 356, 237 Ill…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · July 31, 2002 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global, Inc. (2002)

    … 1447(d) (emphasis added). We construed that language [\388] in Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124 (3d Cir.1998), where we held that "section 1447(d) prohibits review of remand orders \whether…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · April 1, 1996 · in the opinion

    Buckley v. Metro-North Commuter RR (1996)

    …565 F.Supp. 1553, 1560 (N.D.Ill.1983) (prenatal exposure to DES is a physical impact); Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 30 Ohio Misc.2d 11, 14, 507 N.E.2d 476, 480 (Com…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Haver v. BNSF Railway Company (2010)

    …about' such risk. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003.)" BNSF argued that Lynne could not be found to have a lesser burden of proof against it, a user of allegedly…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · February 14, 2007 · in the opinion

    Fleischman v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2007)

    …of limitations, asbestosis and mesothelioma were separate claims even though each was attributed to the same asbestos exposure. Id. at 120-21. In Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. and Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd., recent…

  14. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · March 10, 2003 · in the opinion

    Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Ayers (2003)

    …App. 1993) (citing Hagerty v. L & L Marine Servs., Inc., 788 F. 2d 315, 318 (CA5 1986)); Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 30 Ohio Misc. 2d 11, 14, 507 N. E. 2d 476, 480 (Ct…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    Staubs v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2021)

    …. . to recognize the separate disease rule" in toxic exposure cases); Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 601 N.W.2d 627, 630, 642 (Wis. 1999) (holding that "a person who brings an action based on a…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion

    Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    …defendant "\on a regular basis, over some extended period of time, in proximity to where the \[plaintiff\] actually worked'" (quoting Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir. 1986) (emphasis omitted…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)

    …a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Id. (quoting Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir…

  18. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 1, 2016 · in the opinion

    Kesner v. Superior Court and Haver (2016)

    …. ."\]; accord, Alcaraz v. Vece (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1149, 1156.) In determining whether a premises owner owes a duty to persons on its property, we apply the Rowland factors. (See, e.g., Thai v. Stang (1989…

  19. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 31, 2007

    Penn v. A-Best Prods. Co. (2007)

    Eight Ohio workers or their estates sued many companies, claiming asbestos-related diseases from their employment. Hubbard, Siegel and Price had colon cancer; Williams had laryngeal cancer; Ward had lung cancer; Roth, Penn and Harrison had…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 3, 2009 · in the opinion

    Kurns v. AW Chesterton (2009)

    …date of the Minot, North Dakota, derailment. \[11\] In furtherance of the FRSA Amendment argument, plaintiff also relies on DeFrancisco v. Owens-Illinois, Docket No. CAM-L-1127-05 (N.J. Super. Ct., Cam den Cty…