No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

982 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 50

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · November 12, 1992

    Becht v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1992)

    The Sixth Circuit affirmed the judgment for plaintiff Ann Becht against Owens-Corning, holding it was not entitled to workers' compensation immunity and that the jury's 40% fault allocation and the denial of a new…

  2. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 28, 1998

    Re' v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    Diana Re' sued Owens-Corning, Garlock, W.R. Grace, Flintkote and others in Orleans Parish. She alleged she developed mesothelioma from asbestos dust carried home on her father's work clothes during her childhood, from 1963…

  3. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 1992

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson (1992)

    The Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed the judgment for Watson's estate against Owens-Corning, upholding the compensatory and punitive damages awarded by the jury. A manufacturer has a duty to warn only if it knows…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 11, 1995

    Morton v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995)

    …Morton's consortium award to $30,000, and otherwise affirmed the judgment against Owens-Corning Fiberglas. The consumer expectations test for design defect can apply to asbestos insulation products. Evidence of what the scientific community knew…

  5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · March 23, 1998

    McClain v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    …cohabitation, so Owens-Corning lost. A district court does not abuse its discretion by ordering a new trial on wrongful death damages alone when the award is palpably inadequate and damages are separable from liability. Under…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 14, 1999

    Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    The Superior Court affirmed the trial court's denial of Owens-Corning's motions for judgment n.o.v. and a new trial, leaving the plaintiffs' verdicts and the judgment entered for them in place. Where…

  7. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 27, 1995

    Hefner v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995)

    The appellate court affirmed the Madison County trial court's denial of Owens-Corning Fiberglas's motion to reconsider transfer to Massac County for forum non conveniens, so the plaintiff kept his chosen forum, and remanded…

  8. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 30, 1996

    Thalman v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1996)

    The appellate court affirmed the jury's damages award against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, reversed the trial judge's remittitur of the loss of consortium and wrongful death awards, and remanded for an amended judgment reflecting the…

  9. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995

    Schiavo v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    The Appellate Division affirmed the compensatory and punitive damage awards against Owens-Corning in favor of the Schiavo plaintiffs, finding the Saranac document error harmless given the small punitive award. A 'day in the life' videotape…

  10. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · August 13, 1982

    Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1982)

    Ten insulation workers or their survivors sued makers of asbestos insulation in federal court in Wisconsin. Two of the workers died of mesothelioma, and the other eight have asbestosis. The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing the…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · January 18, 1995

    Consorti v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995)

    Frances Consorti and her husband John sued Owens-Corning Fiberglas and others over John's mesothelioma. The opinion says he was exposed to asbestos between 1960 and 1970, married Frances in 1976, and was diagnosed in…

  12. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · May 14, 1998

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Sitz (1998)

    The court of appeals reversed the $20 million judgment for the Sitz family against Owens-Corning, holding the trial court wrongly applied offensive collateral estoppel on liability issues, and remanded the case. Offensive collateral estoppel should…

  13. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 22, 1994

    Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994)

    The Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment for Owens-Corning Fiberglas, holding that the trial court correctly directed a verdict against Dumin on exposure to OCF Kaylo aboard the Pocono because the evidence was insufficient. Even…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · January 18, 2000

    Barnes v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2000)

    …court's judgments, upholding the denial of new trials, so the estates of Beckmann and Rogers lost and Owens-Corning won. Under Kentucky's apportionment statute, fault may be apportioned only to parties, dismissed or settling…

  15. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · June 5, 1998

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Malone (1998)

    The Texas Supreme Court affirmed both courts of appeals' judgments for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas, holding any error in excluding OCF's mitigation evidence harmless and that the punitive awards, alone or aggregated with…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 2, 1993

    Zenson v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1993)

    The court granted Garlock's motion for a directed verdict and Owens Corning Fiberglas's motion for judgment as a matter of law at the close of plaintiff's case, ruling for the defendants because plaintiff…

  17. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 14, 1997

    Van Winkle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997)

    The appellate court reversed the jury verdicts for the Van Winkle and Hicks plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas because the trial court did not properly answer the jury's question on conspiracy, and remanded for a…

  18. Court case · Florida Supreme Court · August 26, 1999

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Ballard (1999)

    …yes and approved the Fourth District's decision upholding the $31 million punitive damages award for Ballard against Owens-Corning. A punitive award above three times compensatory damages can overcome the statutory presumption of excessiveness under…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit · May 26, 1992

    Rohrbaugh v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1992)

    The Tenth Circuit vacated the judgment for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning and Celotex because the jury instructions wrongly imposed a duty to warn Mrs. Palmer, and remanded for a new trial, so the defendants prevailed…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · January 9, 1981

    Neubauer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1981)

    …Keene, Armstrong Cork, Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois and the third-party defendants, holding that the Wisconsin limitations period runs from the plaintiff's last exposure to any asbestos-containing product, and it set a schedule for…