No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

307 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 16

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · January 22, 1997

    Sharpless v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1997)

    The trial court granted compulsory nonsuits for defendants Owens-Corning Fiberglas, Uniroyal and Harbison Walker Refractories against plaintiffs Dallas Sharpless and Richard Wilson, and issued this opinion explaining the nonsuits for their appeals. In a strict…

  2. Court case · Virginia Supreme Court · January 10, 1992

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Watson (1992)

    The Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed the judgment for Watson's estate against Owens-Corning, upholding the compensatory and punitive damages awarded by the jury. A manufacturer has a duty to warn only if it knows…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 11, 1995

    Morton v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1995)

    …Morton's consortium award to $30,000, and otherwise affirmed the judgment against Owens-Corning Fiberglas. The consumer expectations test for design defect can apply to asbestos insulation products. Evidence of what the scientific community knew…

  4. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 13, 1995

    Higgins v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    The Appellate Division reversed the judgment against Owens-Corning Fiberglas and remanded for a new trial in favor of plaintiff Higgins, and dismissed Owens-Corning's cross appeal on the medical monitoring award as moot. A…

  5. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995

    Schiavo v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    The Appellate Division affirmed the compensatory and punitive damage awards against Owens-Corning in favor of the Schiavo plaintiffs, finding the Saranac document error harmless given the small punitive award. A 'day in the life' videotape…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · November 2, 1993

    Zenson v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1993)

    The court granted Garlock's motion for a directed verdict and Owens Corning Fiberglas's motion for judgment as a matter of law at the close of plaintiff's case, ruling for the defendants because plaintiff…

  7. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · June 5, 1995

    Ripa v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1995)

    The appellate court affirmed liability and compensatory damages for plaintiff Pauline Ripa against Owens-Corning, but cut Owens-Corning's share to thirty percent and reversed the $5.5 million punitive award, remanding for a new…

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 28, 1996

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett (1996)

    …liability findings and compensatory awards for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning, Owens-Illinois and Porter Hayden, but reversed the $1.5 million punitive damages award against Owens-Corning in the Scruggs case. A bystander's proof…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · August 24, 1998

    Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1998)

    Gerald Feidt and his wife sued several companies in New Jersey state court, including Westinghouse (later renamed CBS), over his mesothelioma. He alleged he was exposed to asbestos while working aboard the U.S.S. Enterprise at the Newport News…

  10. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 23, 2005

    Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (2005)

    Thomas Jefferson was one of several hundred plaintiffs suing over asbestos exposure. His claim against his former employer, Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring, alleged that he worked for Cooper as a longshoreman on the Mississippi River in 1965 and at…

  11. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 21, 1995

    Jadlowski v. Owens Corning (1995)

    The Appellate Division reversed the punitive damages award (as remitted to $2,500,000 from a $15,000,000 jury verdict) against Owens-Corning and remanded for a new trial on punitive damages, rejecting the plaintiff…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 12, 1998

    Arena v. Owens Corning Corp. (1998)

    … it remanded for allocation of noneconomic damages between Owens Corning and ACL and otherwise affirmed the judgment for Arena. A supplier of raw asbestos is subject to strict products liability and the consumer expectations test of…

  13. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · April 28, 1997

    Mavroudis v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp. (1997)

    The Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment for the Mavroudis plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. and affirmed the trial court's finding that the pretrial settlements were reasonable. In multi-supplier asbestos cases where the…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · June 30, 1992

    Feldman v. Owens-Illinois (In re Brooklyn Navy Yard Asbestos Litigation, 1992)

    Workers at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, and families of those who died, sued makers of asbestos insulation products for diseases including lung cancer, colon cancer, mesothelioma, laryngeal cancer, pleural disease and asbestosis. The jury, in a joint…

  15. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 7, 1992

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Armstrong (1992)

    The Court of Appeals of Maryland affirmed the compensatory verdicts for workers Armstrong and Wood against Owens-Illinois, but reversed the punitive damages awards and remanded for new trials limited to punitive damages. A trial judge…

  16. Court case · Mississippi Supreme Court · December 12, 1990 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards (1990)

    573 So.2d 704 (1990) OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.; Pittsburgh Corning Corp.; Hopeman Brothers, Inc.; Manville Corp. Asbestos Disease Compensation Fund; Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. and Dmn Electric Supply Co., Inc. v. Charles Gavin EDWARDS. No. 90…

  17. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 25, 1999 · in the opinion

    Owens Corning v. Walatka (1999)

    …on behalf of Russell against \[Pittsburgh Corning Corporation\]. Id. at 355, 667 A.2d 116. In applying the proximity, frequency, and regularity test according to the standards utilized in Balbos, Godwin, and Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…

  18. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 21, 1998

    Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. (1998)

    The court affirmed the jury verdicts for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Kaylo insulation) and Rock Wool (One Shot cement), reversed the judgments against Garlock, A.W. Chesterton and Flexitallic, affirmed the judgments against Abadie…

  19. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · April 14, 1995

    Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1995)

    …judgment for plaintiff Sarah Kirk against Owens-Corning and remanded for a new trial on damages and liability, because the district court refused to strike two biased jurors for cause, impairing Owens-Corning's peremptory challenges…

  20. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 18, 1979

    Weinberg v. Johns-Manville Prods. Corp. (1979)

    The majority held that Owens-Corning Fiberglas was entitled to summary judgment, rejecting Special Term's denial of its motion as premature; Owens-Corning won and the plaintiff and Johns-Manville lost. One justice dissented and…