No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

43 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 3

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · February 25, 1999 · in the opinion

    Owens Corning v. Walatka (1999)

    …on behalf of Russell against \[Pittsburgh Corning Corporation\]. Id. at 355, 667 A.2d 116. In applying the proximity, frequency, and regularity test according to the standards utilized in Balbos, Godwin, and Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1992

    Sealover v. Carey Canada (1992)

    …GAF, National Gypsum) jointly and severally liable, deducted the Owens-Corning settlement and a one-sixth Manville Trust share from the verdict, and awarded the plaintiffs Rule 238 delay damages, with some periods excluded. Where several…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · June 22, 1993

    Sealover v. Carey Canada Inc. (1993)

    Donald Sealover, a carpenter for forty years, came into contact with asbestos-containing products, some made by Johns-Manville. After he developed malignant mesothelioma, he and his wife Alma sued several asbestos product makers and the Manville…

  4. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Jones v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2021)

    …of two or more persons for the purpose of accomplishing by concerted action either an unlawful purpose or a lawful purpose by unlawful means." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) McClure v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 188 Ill…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 6, 2015 · in the opinion

    Galasso v. BF Goodrich (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 2015)

    1995\]). In addition, issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is sufficient to raise an issue of…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion

    Lamson v. Georgia-Pacific LLC (2019)

    …more than the presence of asbestos in the workplace; he must prove that he worked in the vicinity of the product's use. Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 729 A.2d 614, 622 (Pa. Super…

  7. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 11, 2001 · in the opinion

    Dykstra v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)

    …App.3d at 461, 243 Ill.Dec. 579, 723 N.E.2d at 1182. In Hefner v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 276 Ill.App.3d 1099, 213 Ill.Dec. 532, 659 N.E.2d 448 (1995…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · December 10, 2010 · in the opinion

    Albina Engine & Machine v. Director, Owcp (2010)

    …a former employee of Owens-Corning Fiberglass, that Owens-Corning stored asbestos-containing materials at Lockheed's shipyard during the period when Decedent worked there and that at times workers for Owens-Corning installed pipe insulation…

  9. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 31, 2006 · in the opinion

    Thomas v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2006)

    …a review of damage awards made in other cases. In so doing, we find the closest case to this one is Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2003-248 (La.App. 1 Cir. 4/2/04)…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · January 26, 2022 · in the opinion

    Barkley v. 4520 Corp., Inc. (2022)

    …has held that a plaintiff must "prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania · April 3, 1992 · in the opinion

    Sealover v. Carey Canada (1992)

    …F.R.D. 159 (E.D.Pa.1986), in which Judge Newcomer found the Saranac documents sufficient to support a claim for punitive damages against Owens-Illinois and Owens Corning Fiberglas. Ivins is inapposite, because the…

  12. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · November 18, 2009 · in the opinion

    Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLC (2009)

    …and any conflict in the evidence must be resolved in his favor."); see also, Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028, 1033, 1038-1039 (Pa.Super.2004) (holding that the jury was free…

  13. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 19, 2020 · in the opinion

    Roverano v. John Crane, Inc. (2020)

    …case law involving strict liability and asbestos actions. See id. at 23-26 (relying on, inter alia, Martin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, 515 Pa. 377, 528 A.2d 947, 949 (Pa. 1985) (the trial court must…

  14. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 19, 2005 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2005)

    …In some cases, there are no special rules for liability toward contractor's employees, and general negligence rules are applied. (Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (La.Ct.App. 2004) 878 So.2d 631, 639, fn…

  15. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 20, 2007 · in the opinion

    Kinsman v. Unocal Corporation (2007)

    …negligence theory) unless the manufacturer had actual or constructive knowledge of the potential hazard. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003.) Unocal contends the notion of what constitutes a "hazard…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 13, 2023 · in the opinion

    King v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2023)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 14, 2022 · in the opinion

    Roussell v. Huntington Ingalls, Inc. (2022)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  18. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion

    Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)

    …Formosa liken this case to Hunter, supra, 37 Cal.App.4th 1282 and Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 (Dumin). There is no fair comparison. The plaintiff in Hunter testified…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 30, 2024 · in the opinion

    Brooks v. Mission Stucco Company (2024)

    …presented to the jury." (Saller, supra, 187 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1231-1232; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 413…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 4, 2021 · in the opinion

    Swanson v. The Marley-Wylain Co. (2021)

    …than one proximate cause of an injury" such that multiple "causes frequently operate concurrently so that \[they\] constitute a direct proximate cause of the resulting harm." (Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1997) 225 Mich.App…