No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

30 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · April 29, 1999

    Spain v. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. (1999)

    The appellate court affirmed the $1.8 million jury verdict for plaintiff Shirley Spain against Owens Corning Fiberglass, rejecting its challenges to causation, evidence exclusion, the jury instruction, and the denial of a new trial or…

  2. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 23, 1997 · in the opinion

    Metro-North Commuter R. Co. v. Buckley (1997)

    …see, e. g., Herber v. Johns-Manville Corp., 785 F. 2d 79, 85 (CA3 1986); Mauro v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 225 N. J. Super. 196, 542 A. 2d 16 (App. Div. 1988). But with only…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 12, 2007 · in the opinion

    Donoughe v. Lincoln Elec. Co. (2007)

    …free to reject purportedly "unrebutted" evidence showing that the plaintiff could not have been injured by any asbestos exposure from the defendant's product. See Cauthorn v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 840 A.2d 1028, 1033…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · April 27, 2021 · in the opinion

    Connor v. Covil Corporation (2021)

    …For instance, Appellant cites Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, where we affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on the issue of causation. See 69 F.3d at 716…

  5. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 20, 2008 · in the opinion

    Thibodeaux v. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. (2008)

    …4 Cir. 6/28/06), 936 So.2d 209, 213, citing, Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 03-0248 (La.App. 1 Cir. 4/2/04), 878 So.2d 631, 642. In Louisiana courts, "\[t\]he…

  6. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 30, 2015 · in the opinion

    Smith v. Illinois Central R. Co. (2015)

    …1987); Kochan v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 242 Ill.App.3d 781, 182 Ill.Dec. 814, 610 N.E.2d 683 (1993); and Spain v. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp., 304 Ill.App.3d 356, 237 Ill…

  7. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · April 1, 1996 · in the opinion

    Buckley v. Metro-North Commuter RR (1996)

    …565 F.Supp. 1553, 1560 (N.D.Ill.1983) (prenatal exposure to DES is a physical impact); Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 30 Ohio Misc.2d 11, 14, 507 N.E.2d 476, 480 (Com…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2010 · in the opinion

    Haver v. BNSF Railway Company (2010)

    …about' such risk. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 1002-1003.)" BNSF argued that Lynne could not be found to have a lesser burden of proof against it, a user of allegedly…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Kentucky · February 14, 2007 · in the opinion

    Fleischman v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2007)

    …of limitations, asbestosis and mesothelioma were separate claims even though each was attributed to the same asbestos exposure. Id. at 120-21. In Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. and Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd., recent…

  10. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · March 10, 2003 · in the opinion

    Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Ayers (2003)

    …App. 1993) (citing Hagerty v. L & L Marine Servs., Inc., 788 F. 2d 315, 318 (CA5 1986)); Lavelle v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 30 Ohio Misc. 2d 11, 14, 507 N. E. 2d 476, 480 (Ct…

  11. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 22, 2021 · in the opinion

    Staubs v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2021)

    …. . to recognize the separate disease rule" in toxic exposure cases); Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 601 N.W.2d 627, 630, 642 (Wis. 1999) (holding that "a person who brings an action based on a…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 25, 2016 · in the opinion

    Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)

    …defendant "\on a regular basis, over some extended period of time, in proximity to where the \[plaintiff\] actually worked'" (quoting Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir. 1986) (emphasis omitted…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · September 16, 2020 · in the opinion

    Coffin v. Ametek, Inc. (2020)

    …a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Id. (quoting Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162-63 (4th Cir…

  14. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 1, 2016 · in the opinion

    Kesner v. Superior Court and Haver (2016)

    …. ."\]; accord, Alcaraz v. Vece (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1149, 1156.) In determining whether a premises owner owes a duty to persons on its property, we apply the Rowland factors. (See, e.g., Thai v. Stang (1989…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 3, 2009 · in the opinion

    Kurns v. AW Chesterton (2009)

    …date of the Minot, North Dakota, derailment. \[11\] In furtherance of the FRSA Amendment argument, plaintiff also relies on DeFrancisco v. Owens-Illinois, Docket No. CAM-L-1127-05 (N.J. Super. Ct., Cam den Cty…

  16. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · November 19, 2015 · in the opinion

    Estate OF Brust v. Acf Industries, LLC (2015)

    …established by this record are so few and so limited that they simply fail to meet the "frequency, regularity, and proximity" test. That test was satisfied in Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 186 N.J. 394…

  17. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion

    Laverty v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2010)

    …BUSHNELL PACKING, JOHN CRANE, INC., METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY, NEW YORK AIR BRAKE CORPORATION, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., PECORA CORPORATION, RAILROAD FRICTION PRODUCTS CORPORATION, RAPID-AMERICAN CORPORATION, RILEY STOKER CORPORATION, ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 30, 2018 · in the opinion

    Jack v. Borg-Warner Morse Tec, LLC (2018)

    …s analysis is "inconsistent" with two non-binding authorities: Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda County., 384 P.3d 284 (Cal. 2016) and Olivio v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 895 A.2d 1143 (N.J. 2006). (Mot…

  19. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 10, 2010 · in the opinion

    Simpkins v. CSX Corp. (2010)

    …Moreover, every person owes every other person the duty to use ordinary care to prevent any injury that might naturally occur as the reasonably foreseeable consequence [\1262] of his or her own actions. See Forsythe v…

  20. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 2, 2022 · in the opinion

    Nuckols v. Consol. Rail Corp. (2022)

    …nevertheless, that there existed factual disputes regarding when plaintiff first had a duty to investigate whether his exposure to diesel exhaust may have been a cause of his cancers. See also Owens v. Union Pacific RR…